Journal of clinical periodontology · 2013
The effects of stress on periodontal treatment: a longitudinal investigation using clinical and biological markers.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bakri Issam, Douglas Charles W Ian, Rawlinson Andrew
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the effects of psychosocial stress on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment (NPT).
METHODS: Patients were categorized as stressed or unstressed, and the degree of stress was measured. One deep bleeding and one deep non-bleeding site ≥6 mm were selected in each patient for detailed investigation, and the clinical parameters were recorded before and at 6 months after NPT. Elastase and C-terminal teleopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) were measured in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples at both intervals.
RESULTS: The baseline, clinical parameters and biological markers were similar in both stressed and unstressed groups, other than for GCF elastase levels, which were significantly higher in the stressed group of patients (p < 0.05). The effect of stress on the changes for clinical measurements and elastase levels in GCF was statistically significant for deep bleeding sites, with the response to treatment being poorer in the stressed group. The effects of smoking and the degree of stress were not statistically significant for any of the clinical or biological parameters (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients under psychosocial stress had a poorer outcome following NPT. The assessment of psychosocial stress may be valuable in the holistic management of periodontal disease.
METHODS: Patients were categorized as stressed or unstressed, and the degree of stress was measured. One deep bleeding and one deep non-bleeding site ≥6 mm were selected in each patient for detailed investigation, and the clinical parameters were recorded before and at 6 months after NPT. Elastase and C-terminal teleopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) were measured in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples at both intervals.
RESULTS: The baseline, clinical parameters and biological markers were similar in both stressed and unstressed groups, other than for GCF elastase levels, which were significantly higher in the stressed group of patients (p < 0.05). The effect of stress on the changes for clinical measurements and elastase levels in GCF was statistically significant for deep bleeding sites, with the response to treatment being poorer in the stressed group. The effects of smoking and the degree of stress were not statistically significant for any of the clinical or biological parameters (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients under psychosocial stress had a poorer outcome following NPT. The assessment of psychosocial stress may be valuable in the holistic management of periodontal disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBiomarkersChronic PeriodontitisCollagen Type IFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGingival Crevicular FluidGingival HemorrhageGingival RecessionHumansHydrocortisoneInflammation MediatorsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic ElastasePeptidesPeriodontal Attachment LossPeriodontal DebridementPeriodontal PocketSalivaSmokingStress, PsychologicalTreatment Outcome