MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.05.007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research · 2013

Periodontal plastic pioneering procedures revisited.

Singhal Rameshwari, Agarwal Vipin, Khattak B P, Sharma Anamika, Agarwal Vivek, Rastogi Pavitra

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Various periodontal plastic procedures are available for treatment of localized gingival recessions. However, in the mirage of newer techniques and materials available, it is difficult for clinicians to decide on the treatment modality. Pioneering techniques provide a cost effective and effective means of maintaining esthetics in recession cases.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Twenty-two subjects with localized gingival recessions were divided in equal groups and treated with lateral pedicle graft (Group A) and Free mucosal graft (Group B). Clinical parameters of length and width of recession and apico coronal length of keratinized gingiva (ACKG) was measured at baseline, 30 and 90 days. Root coverage percentage was calculated.

RESULTS

Both groups were effective in recession coverage and gain in ACKG. Root coverage gained in Group A was 65.0 ± 25.2% and for Group B was 61.6 ± 20.5%.

CONCLUSION

Lateral pedicle graft and Free mucosal graft provide not only effective means of gaining in root coverage of localized gingival recession cases but also result in gain of ACKG. These techniques remain an important part of periodontal plastic surgery.

Для цитирования: Singhal Rameshwari, Agarwal Vipin, Khattak B P, Sharma Anamika, Agarwal Vivek, Rastogi Pavitra. Periodontal plastic pioneering procedures revisited.. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.05.007.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.