Revista medico-chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi · 2012
[Clinical biocompatibility of diacrilic resin veneers].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dima Raluca
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The great variety of modern composite resins developed recently by manufacturers, offered to clinicians multiple choices of restoring esthetic of frontal teeth.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was performed over a period of 8 months. The patients were devided in two groups: A consisted of patients that received indirect veneers; and B consisted of patients that received direct veneers.
RESULTS: The clinical evaluation showed no major differences between group A and B, concerning the gingival recesion data and also concerning the plaque index.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained from the study made us assess that direct and indirect composite materials have a clinically acceptable result in terms of biocompatibility when used for frontal veneers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was performed over a period of 8 months. The patients were devided in two groups: A consisted of patients that received indirect veneers; and B consisted of patients that received direct veneers.
RESULTS: The clinical evaluation showed no major differences between group A and B, concerning the gingival recesion data and also concerning the plaque index.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained from the study made us assess that direct and indirect composite materials have a clinically acceptable result in terms of biocompatibility when used for frontal veneers.