Journal of clinical periodontology · 2012
A comparison of Er:YAG laser and mechanical debridement for the non-surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized, prospective clinical study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soo Lingfeng, Leichter Jonathan W, Windle Judith, Monteith Brian, Williams Sheila M, Seymour Gregory J, Cullinan Mary P
Аннотация
AIMS: To compare a monotherapy of Er:YAG laser debridement (ERL), wavelength 2940 nm, with mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of chronic periodontitis using clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
METHODS: Twenty-eight participants had two randomly assigned quadrants treated with ERL and two with SRP. Full-mouth plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 6- and 12-weeks post therapy. A questionnaire was used to assess pain, discomfort and satisfaction during and after treatment.
RESULTS: Twenty-two participants completed treatment and had 6- and 12-week clinical re-evaluations. SRP provided greater mean pocket depth reduction at 6- and 12-weeks (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively), and a greater reduction in pockets ≥ 4 mm at 6 weeks only (p = 0.03) compared with ERL. SRP also resulted in a significant reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP) sites at 12 weeks compared with ERL and a statistically significant greater reduction in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6- (p = 0.02) and 12-weeks (p = 0.03). Patients expressed greater satisfaction with SRP on the day of treatment but were equally satisfied subsequently.
CONCLUSION: SRP resulted in a statistically significant greater short-term improvement in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction compared with ERL.
METHODS: Twenty-eight participants had two randomly assigned quadrants treated with ERL and two with SRP. Full-mouth plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 6- and 12-weeks post therapy. A questionnaire was used to assess pain, discomfort and satisfaction during and after treatment.
RESULTS: Twenty-two participants completed treatment and had 6- and 12-week clinical re-evaluations. SRP provided greater mean pocket depth reduction at 6- and 12-weeks (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively), and a greater reduction in pockets ≥ 4 mm at 6 weeks only (p = 0.03) compared with ERL. SRP also resulted in a significant reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP) sites at 12 weeks compared with ERL and a statistically significant greater reduction in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6- (p = 0.02) and 12-weeks (p = 0.03). Patients expressed greater satisfaction with SRP on the day of treatment but were equally satisfied subsequently.
CONCLUSION: SRP resulted in a statistically significant greater short-term improvement in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction compared with ERL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedChronic PeriodontitisDental Plaque IndexDental ScalingFemaleGingival RecessionHumansLasers, Solid-StateLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPeriodontal Attachment LossPeriodontal DebridementPeriodontal IndexProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic Therapy