Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
Characterizing Nonculprit Lesions and Perivascular Adipose Tissue of Patients Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Comparative Study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Xiaomeng, Sia Ching H, Adamson Philip D, Greer Charlotte E, Huang Weimin, Lee Hwee K, Leng Shuang, Loong Yan T, Raffiee Nur A S, Tan Swee Y, Tan Sock H, Teo Lynette L S, Wong Sung L, Yang Xiaoxun, Yew Min S, Yong Thon H, Zhong Liang, Shaw Leslee J, Chan Mark Y Y, Hausenloy Derek J, Baskaran Lohendran
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography plaques and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) between patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) posttreatment and patients with stable coronary artery disease is poorly understood. Our objective was to evaluate the differences in coronary computed tomography angiography-quantified plaque and PVAT characteristics in patients post-AMI and identify signs of residual inflammation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 205 patients (age, 59.77±9.24 years; 92.20% men) with AMI ≤1 month and matched them with 205 patients with stable coronary artery disease (age, 60.52±10.04 years; 90.24% men) based on age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary computed tomography angiography scans were assessed for nonculprit plaque and vessel characteristics, plaque volumes by composition, high-risk plaques, and PVAT mean attenuation. Both patient groups exhibited similar noncalcified plaque volumes (383.35±313.23 versus 378.63±426.25 mm3, P=0.899). However, multivariable analysis revealed that patients post-AMI had a greater patient-wise noncalcified plaque volume ratio (estimate, 0.089 [95% CI, 0.053-0.125], P<0.001), largely attributed to a higher fibrofatty and necrotic core volume ratio, along with higher peri-lesion PVAT mean attenuation (estimate, 3.968 [95% CI, 2.556-5.379], P<0.001). When adjusted for vessel length, patients post-AMI had more high-risk plaques (estimate, 0.417 [95% CI, 0.298-0.536], P<0.001) per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients post-AMI displayed heightened noncalcified plaque components, largely due to fibrofatty and necrotic core content, more high-risk plaques, and increased PVAT mean attenuation on a per-patient level, highlighting the necessity for refined risk assessment in patients with AMI after treatment.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 205 patients (age, 59.77±9.24 years; 92.20% men) with AMI ≤1 month and matched them with 205 patients with stable coronary artery disease (age, 60.52±10.04 years; 90.24% men) based on age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary computed tomography angiography scans were assessed for nonculprit plaque and vessel characteristics, plaque volumes by composition, high-risk plaques, and PVAT mean attenuation. Both patient groups exhibited similar noncalcified plaque volumes (383.35±313.23 versus 378.63±426.25 mm3, P=0.899). However, multivariable analysis revealed that patients post-AMI had a greater patient-wise noncalcified plaque volume ratio (estimate, 0.089 [95% CI, 0.053-0.125], P<0.001), largely attributed to a higher fibrofatty and necrotic core volume ratio, along with higher peri-lesion PVAT mean attenuation (estimate, 3.968 [95% CI, 2.556-5.379], P<0.001). When adjusted for vessel length, patients post-AMI had more high-risk plaques (estimate, 0.417 [95% CI, 0.298-0.536], P<0.001) per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients post-AMI displayed heightened noncalcified plaque components, largely due to fibrofatty and necrotic core content, more high-risk plaques, and increased PVAT mean attenuation on a per-patient level, highlighting the necessity for refined risk assessment in patients with AMI after treatment.