Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2011
The assessment of left ventricular systolic asynchrony in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kırış Abdulkadir, Erem Cihangir, Kırış Gülhanım, Nuhoğlu Irfan, Karaman Kayıhan, Civan Nadim, Örem Cihan, Durmuş Ismet, Kutlu Merih
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) is associated with a variety of cardiovascular disturbances such as left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, diastolic cardiac dysfunction, and hypertension. LV asynchrony is defined as the loss of the simultaneous peak contraction of corresponding cardiac segments. The objective of this study was to assess systolic asynchrony in patients with overt hyperparthyroidism.
METHODS: Asynchrony was evaluated in 22 patients with PHP and 24 controls. All the patients and controls were subjected to a tissue synchronization imaging (TSI). The time to regional peak systolic tissue velocity (Ts) in LV by the six-basal-six-midsegmental model was measured on ejection phase TSI images and four TSI parameters of systolic asynchrony were computed.
RESULTS: All TSI parameters of LV asynchrony increased in patients with PHP patients compared to the controls: the standard deviation (SD) of the 12 LV segments Ts (37.3±20.6 vs. 21.5±11.1, P=0.01); the maximal difference in Ts between any 2 of the 12 LV segments (111.2±59.8 vs. 70.2±32.1, P=0.01); the SD of the 6 basal LV segments (42.9±36.4 vs. 18.5±13, P=0.003); and the maximal difference in Ts between any 2 of the 6 basal LV segments (89.6±50.5 vs. 48±31.1, P=0.003).
CONCLUSION: Patients with PHP show an evidence of LV asynchrony by TSI. Asynchrony may contribute to the harmful cardiovascular effects of PHP.
METHODS: Asynchrony was evaluated in 22 patients with PHP and 24 controls. All the patients and controls were subjected to a tissue synchronization imaging (TSI). The time to regional peak systolic tissue velocity (Ts) in LV by the six-basal-six-midsegmental model was measured on ejection phase TSI images and four TSI parameters of systolic asynchrony were computed.
RESULTS: All TSI parameters of LV asynchrony increased in patients with PHP patients compared to the controls: the standard deviation (SD) of the 12 LV segments Ts (37.3±20.6 vs. 21.5±11.1, P=0.01); the maximal difference in Ts between any 2 of the 12 LV segments (111.2±59.8 vs. 70.2±32.1, P=0.01); the SD of the 6 basal LV segments (42.9±36.4 vs. 18.5±13, P=0.003); and the maximal difference in Ts between any 2 of the 6 basal LV segments (89.6±50.5 vs. 48±31.1, P=0.003).
CONCLUSION: Patients with PHP show an evidence of LV asynchrony by TSI. Asynchrony may contribute to the harmful cardiovascular effects of PHP.