Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2010
A randomized trial of cholecalciferol versus doxercalciferol for lowering parathyroid hormone in chronic kidney disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moe Sharon M, Saifullah Akber, LaClair Robert E, Usman Sohail A, Yu Zhangsheng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a randomized, blinded, 3-month trial in vitamin D-deficient CKD stage 3 and 4 patients with parathyroid hormone (PTH) values above the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative target, comparing cholecalciferol (4000 IU/d x 1 month, then 2000 IU/d; n = 22) to doxercalciferol (1 microg/d; n = 25).
RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline demographics or lab tests, except a slightly higher estimated GFR (eGFR) in the doxercalciferol group. There was a significant increase in vitamin D level in the cholecalciferol group (14 +/- 6 to 37 +/- 10 ng/ml; P < 0.001) but no change in the doxercalciferol group. The PTH decreased by 27% +/- 34% in the doxercalciferol group (P = 0.002) and decreased by 10% +/- 31% in the cholecalciferol group (P = 0.16), but the difference between treatments was NS (P = 0.11). Similar results were found when absolute PTH change from baseline to end point was analyzed in a repeated-measures ANOVA model. The serum calcium and urine calcium excretions were not different. Additional non-mineral-related end points, albuminuria, and BP were evaluated, and although trends were present, this did not reach significance.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized trial demonstrated a within-group reduction in PTH in the doxercalciferol-treated patients but no significant difference between the doxercalciferol and cholecalciferol patients. Larger, long-term studies are needed to demonstrate efficacy of mineral-related and non-mineral-related end points and safety.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a randomized, blinded, 3-month trial in vitamin D-deficient CKD stage 3 and 4 patients with parathyroid hormone (PTH) values above the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative target, comparing cholecalciferol (4000 IU/d x 1 month, then 2000 IU/d; n = 22) to doxercalciferol (1 microg/d; n = 25).
RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline demographics or lab tests, except a slightly higher estimated GFR (eGFR) in the doxercalciferol group. There was a significant increase in vitamin D level in the cholecalciferol group (14 +/- 6 to 37 +/- 10 ng/ml; P < 0.001) but no change in the doxercalciferol group. The PTH decreased by 27% +/- 34% in the doxercalciferol group (P = 0.002) and decreased by 10% +/- 31% in the cholecalciferol group (P = 0.16), but the difference between treatments was NS (P = 0.11). Similar results were found when absolute PTH change from baseline to end point was analyzed in a repeated-measures ANOVA model. The serum calcium and urine calcium excretions were not different. Additional non-mineral-related end points, albuminuria, and BP were evaluated, and although trends were present, this did not reach significance.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized trial demonstrated a within-group reduction in PTH in the doxercalciferol-treated patients but no significant difference between the doxercalciferol and cholecalciferol patients. Larger, long-term studies are needed to demonstrate efficacy of mineral-related and non-mineral-related end points and safety.