Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2017
Training therapists to work with people with intellectual disability in Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dagnan Dave, Masson John, Thwaites Richard, James Amy, Hatton Chris
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current policy in the England suggests that people with intellectual disabilities should, where possible, access mainstream mental health services; this should include access to mainstream therapy services. It is likely that mainstream therapists will need training and support to work with people with intellectual disabilities.
METHOD: Sixty-eight therapists working in an English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service received one- or 2-day training on working with people with intellectual disabilities. Measures of confidence, general therapeutic self-efficacy and attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities' use of mainstream mental health services were completed pre-training, post-training and at 3-month follow-up; at which time, 12 participants were interviewed about the impact of the training on their practice.
RESULTS: There was a significant positive change in all measures immediately post-training which was maintained at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Training considerations for mainstream therapists who may work with people with intellectual disabilities are discussed.
METHOD: Sixty-eight therapists working in an English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service received one- or 2-day training on working with people with intellectual disabilities. Measures of confidence, general therapeutic self-efficacy and attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities' use of mainstream mental health services were completed pre-training, post-training and at 3-month follow-up; at which time, 12 participants were interviewed about the impact of the training on their practice.
RESULTS: There was a significant positive change in all measures immediately post-training which was maintained at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Training considerations for mainstream therapists who may work with people with intellectual disabilities are discussed.