MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.006

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2022

Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts.

Lou Zhengcai

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare recurrence rates and symptomatic relief in symptomatic maxillary sinus Retention Cysts (RCs) between Middle Meatus Antrostomy (MMA) alone and Inferior Meatus Antrostomy (IMA) with basal mucosa electrocoagulation.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic unilateral maxillary RCs were randomly allocated to MMA (n=54) and IMA combined with mucosa electrocoagulation (n=53) groups. Symptomatic relief, cyst recurrence, and closure of the antrostomy opening were compared at 12-months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Symptomatic failure occurred in 13 (12.1%) patients, including 9 (16.7%) MMA and 4 (7.5%) IMA patients; this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.251). Postoperative cyst recurrence occurred in 16 (29.7%) and 1 (1.9%) patient in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Closure of the opening occurred in 7 (13.0%) and 17 (32.1%) patients in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p=0.032). However, there were no significant pairwise correlations between closure of the opening and symptomatic failure or cyst recurrence.

CONCLUSION

IMA combined with basal mucosa electrocoagulation and MMA alone provided similar symptomatic relief for symptomatic maxillary RCs, but IMA had shorter operation times and lower postoperative recurrence rates of RCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b.

Для цитирования: Lou Zhengcai. Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.