Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2010
Treatment of genu recurvatum in hemiparetic adult patients: a systematic literature review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bleyenheuft C, Bleyenheuft Y, Hanson P, Deltombe T
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of the literature on treatment of genu recurvatum in hemiparetic adult patients by searching the PubMed, Pedro, Trip Database and Science Direct databases. The following keywords were used: (recurvatum or hyperextension or knee) and (hemiplegia or hemiparesis).
RESULTS: Nine articles met our selection criteria. Four assessed retraining methods (functional electric stimulation or electrogoniometric feedback), two assessed orthopaedic or neurosurgical treatments and three articles focused on orthoses.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Even though all the various treatments produced encouraging results, most of the reviewed studies presented methodological limitations. Moreover, none of the selected articles suggested a treatment strategy which takes account of the various aetiologies in genu recurvatum. On the basis of some of the reviewed articles and our own clinical experience, we propose an aetiology-specific treatment strategy for genu recurvatum patients. In a broad patient population, this categorization could form the basis for testing the specificity of each treatment method as a function of the cause of genu recurvatum. This approach could help confirm the clinical indications and identify the most appropriate treatment for each patient.
RESULTS: Nine articles met our selection criteria. Four assessed retraining methods (functional electric stimulation or electrogoniometric feedback), two assessed orthopaedic or neurosurgical treatments and three articles focused on orthoses.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Even though all the various treatments produced encouraging results, most of the reviewed studies presented methodological limitations. Moreover, none of the selected articles suggested a treatment strategy which takes account of the various aetiologies in genu recurvatum. On the basis of some of the reviewed articles and our own clinical experience, we propose an aetiology-specific treatment strategy for genu recurvatum patients. In a broad patient population, this categorization could form the basis for testing the specificity of each treatment method as a function of the cause of genu recurvatum. This approach could help confirm the clinical indications and identify the most appropriate treatment for each patient.