MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00405-022-07675-2

Медицинская библиотека · European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022

Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.

Kara Ahmet, Kalcioglu Mahmut Tayyar, Adigul Çağlayan, Topcu Merve Torun, Koçoğlu Mehmet, Celik Bilgehan, Yilmaz Mahmut Sinan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the audiological performances of Turkey's most up-to-date bone conduction implant processors.

METHODS

Twenty-six bone-anchored hearing instrument users, thirteen in each group, were evaluated for speech understanding in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios.

RESULTS

We noticed the differences at 0.5 and 1 kHz measurements in free field frequency specific test, aided SRT scores, non-adaptive and adaptive matrix test results for a few conditions created a statistically significant difference in favor of Baha-6®.

CONCLUSIONS

Both processors offer positive gains to their users in noisy and silent conditions. However, the data showed statistically significant differences for some measurements that may be critical for patients in daily practice.

Для цитирования: Kara Ahmet, Kalcioglu Mahmut Tayyar, Adigul Çağlayan, Topcu Merve Torun, Koçoğlu Mehmet, Celik Bilgehan, Yilmaz Mahmut Sinan. Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07675-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.