British journal of anaesthesia · 2010
Pressure-controlled ventilation and intrabronchial pressure during one-lung ventilation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rozé H, Lafargue M, Batoz H, Picat M Q, Perez P, Ouattara A, Janvier G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) has been suggested to reduce peak airway pressure (P(peak)) and intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation (OLV) when compared with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). At the same tidal volume (V(T)), the apparent difference in P(peak) is mainly related to the presence of a double-lumen tracheal tube. We tested the hypothesis that the decrease in P(peak) observed in the breathing circuit is not necessarily associated with a decrease in the bronchus of the dependent lung.
METHODS: This observational study included 15 consecutive subjects who were ventilated with VCV followed by PCV at constant V(T). Airway pressure was measured simultaneously in the breathing circuit and main bronchus of the dependent lung after 20 min of ventilation.
RESULTS: PCV induced a significant decrease in P(peak) [mean (sd)] measured in the breathing circuit [36 (4) to 26 (3) cm H(2)0, P<0.0001] and in the bronchus [23 (4) to 22 (3) cm H(2)O, P=0.01]. However, the interaction (ventilatory mode x site of measurement) revealed that the decrease in P(peak) was significantly higher in the circuit (P<0.0001). Although the mean percentage decrease in P(peak) was significant at both sites, the decrease was significantly lower in the bronchus [5 (6)% vs 29 (3)%, P<0.0001].
CONCLUSIONS: During PCV for OLV, the decrease in P(peak) is observed mainly in the respiratory circuit and is probably not clinically relevant in the bronchus of the dependent lung. This challenges the common clinical perception that PCV offers an advantage over VCV during OLV by reducing bronchial P(peak).
METHODS: This observational study included 15 consecutive subjects who were ventilated with VCV followed by PCV at constant V(T). Airway pressure was measured simultaneously in the breathing circuit and main bronchus of the dependent lung after 20 min of ventilation.
RESULTS: PCV induced a significant decrease in P(peak) [mean (sd)] measured in the breathing circuit [36 (4) to 26 (3) cm H(2)0, P<0.0001] and in the bronchus [23 (4) to 22 (3) cm H(2)O, P=0.01]. However, the interaction (ventilatory mode x site of measurement) revealed that the decrease in P(peak) was significantly higher in the circuit (P<0.0001). Although the mean percentage decrease in P(peak) was significant at both sites, the decrease was significantly lower in the bronchus [5 (6)% vs 29 (3)%, P<0.0001].
CONCLUSIONS: During PCV for OLV, the decrease in P(peak) is observed mainly in the respiratory circuit and is probably not clinically relevant in the bronchus of the dependent lung. This challenges the common clinical perception that PCV offers an advantage over VCV during OLV by reducing bronchial P(peak).