Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2020
Validation of the VT-LVAD score for prediction of late VAs in LVAD recipients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Darma Angeliki, Arya Arash, Dagres Nikolaos, Kühl Michael, Hindricks Gerhard, Eifert Sandra, Saeed Diyar, Borger Michael, Martins Raphaël P, Leclercq Christophe, Galand Vincent
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to validate the performance of the VT-LVAD risk model in predicting late ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.
BACKGROUND: The need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-implantation in LVAD recipients is not well studied. A better selection of the patients with high risk for late VAs could lead to a more targeted ICD-implantation or replacement.
METHODS: The study evaluated the performance of the VT-LVAD prognostic score (VAs prior LVAD, no ACE-inhibitor in medication, heart failure duration > 12 months, early VAs post-LVAD implantation, atrial fibrillation prior LVAD, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy) for the endpoint of the occurrence of late VAs in 357 LVAD patients in Heart Centre of Leipzig.
RESULTS: From the initial 460 patients, 357 (age: 58 ± 10 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 20 ± 6%; HeartWare: 50%; HeartMate III: 42%) were assigned to four risk groups according to their VT-LVAD score varying from low risk to very high risk. After 25 months, late VAs occurred in 130 patients. The VT-LVAD score was an independent predictor of late VAs (multivariate analysis; p = < .001; goodness-of-tip p = .347; odds ratio: 4.8). While there was no statistically significant difference between the low- and intermediate-risk group, risk stratification for patients with high risk and very high risk performed more accurately (pairwise comparison p = .005 and p < .001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The VT-LVAD score predicted accurately the occurrence of late VAs in high-risk LVAD recipients in a large external cohort of LVAD recipients supporting its utility for more targeted ICD implantations.
BACKGROUND: The need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-implantation in LVAD recipients is not well studied. A better selection of the patients with high risk for late VAs could lead to a more targeted ICD-implantation or replacement.
METHODS: The study evaluated the performance of the VT-LVAD prognostic score (VAs prior LVAD, no ACE-inhibitor in medication, heart failure duration > 12 months, early VAs post-LVAD implantation, atrial fibrillation prior LVAD, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy) for the endpoint of the occurrence of late VAs in 357 LVAD patients in Heart Centre of Leipzig.
RESULTS: From the initial 460 patients, 357 (age: 58 ± 10 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 20 ± 6%; HeartWare: 50%; HeartMate III: 42%) were assigned to four risk groups according to their VT-LVAD score varying from low risk to very high risk. After 25 months, late VAs occurred in 130 patients. The VT-LVAD score was an independent predictor of late VAs (multivariate analysis; p = < .001; goodness-of-tip p = .347; odds ratio: 4.8). While there was no statistically significant difference between the low- and intermediate-risk group, risk stratification for patients with high risk and very high risk performed more accurately (pairwise comparison p = .005 and p < .001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The VT-LVAD score predicted accurately the occurrence of late VAs in high-risk LVAD recipients in a large external cohort of LVAD recipients supporting its utility for more targeted ICD implantations.