MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4012/dmj.2022-098

Медицинская библиотека · Dental materials journal · 2022

Analysis of the feasibility of using deep learning for multiclass classification of dental anomalies on panoramic radiographs.

Okazaki Shota, Mine Yuichi, Iwamoto Yuko, Urabe Shiho, Mitsuhata Chieko, Nomura Ryota, Kakimoto Naoya, Murayama Takeshi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of the feasibility study was to construct deep learning models for the classification of multiple dental anomalies in panoramic radiographs. Panoramic radiographs with single supernumerary teeth and/or odontomas were considered the "case" group; panoramic radiographs with no dental anomalies were considered the "control" group. The dataset comprised 150 panoramic radiographs: 50 each of no dental anomalies, single supernumerary teeth, and odontomas. To classify the panoramic radiographs into case and control categories, we employed AlexNet, which is a convolutional neural network model. AlexNet was able to classify whole panoramic radiographs into two or three classes, according to the presence or absence of supernumerary teeth or odontomas. The performance metrics of the three-class classification were 70%, 70.8%, 70%, and 69.7% for accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and F1 score, respectively, in the macro average. These results support the feasibility of using deep learning to detect multiple dental anomalies in panoramic radiographs.

Для цитирования: Okazaki Shota, Mine Yuichi, Iwamoto Yuko, Urabe Shiho, Mitsuhata Chieko, Nomura Ryota, Kakimoto Naoya, Murayama Takeshi. Analysis of the feasibility of using deep learning for multiclass classification of dental anomalies on panoramic radiographs.. Dental materials journal. 2022. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2022-098.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.