Surgery · 2015
Postoperative outcomes with cholecystectomy in lung transplant recipients.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taghavi Sharven, Ambur Vishnu, Jayarajan Senthil N, Gaughan John, Toyoda Yoshiya, Dauer Elizabeth, Sjoholm Lars Ola, Pathak Abhijit, Santora Thomas, Goldberg Amy J, Rappold Joseph
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data on outcomes for lung transplant (LT) recipients requiring general surgery procedures. This study examined outcomes after cholecystectomy in LT recipients using a large database.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample Database (2005-2010) was queried for all LT patients requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC).
RESULTS: There were a total of 377 cholecystectomies performed in LT patients. The majority were done for acute cholecystitis (n = 218; 57%) and were done urgently/emergently (n = 258; 68%). There were a total of 304 (81%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 73 (19%) OC. There was no difference in age when comparing the laparoscopic and open groups (53.6 vs 55.5 years; P = .39). In addition, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was similar in the 2 groups (P = .07). Patients undergoing OC were more likely to have perioperative myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, or any complication compared with the laparoscopic group. Total hospital charges ($59,137.00 vs $106,329.80; P = .03) and median duration of stay (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P = .02) were both greater with open compared with LC.
CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy can be performed safely in the LT population with minimal morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample Database (2005-2010) was queried for all LT patients requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC).
RESULTS: There were a total of 377 cholecystectomies performed in LT patients. The majority were done for acute cholecystitis (n = 218; 57%) and were done urgently/emergently (n = 258; 68%). There were a total of 304 (81%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 73 (19%) OC. There was no difference in age when comparing the laparoscopic and open groups (53.6 vs 55.5 years; P = .39). In addition, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was similar in the 2 groups (P = .07). Patients undergoing OC were more likely to have perioperative myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, or any complication compared with the laparoscopic group. Total hospital charges ($59,137.00 vs $106,329.80; P = .03) and median duration of stay (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P = .02) were both greater with open compared with LC.
CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy can be performed safely in the LT population with minimal morbidity and mortality.