Kulak burun bogaz ihtisas dergisi : KBB = Journal of ear, nose, and throat · 2015
Transoral versus transcervical approach to submandibular gland: techniques and outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Çukurova İbrahim, Arslan İlker Burak, Bulğurcu Suphi, Demirhan Erhan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the risks and benefits of the transoral approach for removal of the submandibular gland compared to the transcervical approach.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who underwent submandibular gland excision surgery via the transoral (6 males, 4 females; mean age 45.4 years) or transcervical (7 males, 3 females; mean age 44.1 years) approach between March 2009 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Age, surgical indications, complications, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative histopathological results were recorded and compared between two groups.
RESULTS: Of 20 patients, 35% were previously treated with antibiotics. There were no significantly differences in demographic characteristics and postoperative histopathological results between the groups (p<0.05). Duration of hospitalization was statistically shorter in the patients operated via transoral approach (p<0.05). Relapsing sialoadenitis occurred in a patient who was operated by transoral approach due to the incomplete resection of the gland.
CONCLUSION: The transoral approach for submandibular gland excision has several advantages over the transcervical approach in terms of cosmetic outcome, marginal mandibular nerve injury, and length of hospital stay.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who underwent submandibular gland excision surgery via the transoral (6 males, 4 females; mean age 45.4 years) or transcervical (7 males, 3 females; mean age 44.1 years) approach between March 2009 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Age, surgical indications, complications, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative histopathological results were recorded and compared between two groups.
RESULTS: Of 20 patients, 35% were previously treated with antibiotics. There were no significantly differences in demographic characteristics and postoperative histopathological results between the groups (p<0.05). Duration of hospitalization was statistically shorter in the patients operated via transoral approach (p<0.05). Relapsing sialoadenitis occurred in a patient who was operated by transoral approach due to the incomplete resection of the gland.
CONCLUSION: The transoral approach for submandibular gland excision has several advantages over the transcervical approach in terms of cosmetic outcome, marginal mandibular nerve injury, and length of hospital stay.