MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12669/pjms.334.12577

Медицинская библиотека · Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2017

Management of community acquired pneumonia by Family Physicians.

Akhter Saima, Rizvi Nadeem, Bhura Sajeer, Warraich Usman Ali

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)is a major burden on health systemwith significant mortality and morbidity. Family Physicians(FPs)can play important role. To determine management strategies and prescription of FPs regarding CAP.

METHODS

A multicenter cross sectional survey was done in 10 cities of Pakistan from November 2014 to January 2015. Self-administered questionnaire was filled by 110 Family Physicians.

RESULTS

Of total 71% of FPs reported to work in high prevalence areas for respiratory ailments. Only 32% of FPs used PSI and 34% CURB 65 for assessment of severity. It was alarming to note that only 58% of FPs treats severe pneumonia with Intravenous antibiotics while rests were comfortable with oral route. The overall use of quinolones to treat CAP, irrespective of severity, in combination or as single agent was > 60%. Duration of antibiotics for severe pneumonia was sub optimal (<10 days). Only 52.8% patients came back for follow-up so true outcome cannot be anticipated.

CONCLUSION

Major deficiencies were treatment of severe pneumonia in community, inappropriate use of quinolones and poor knowledge of recent guidelines. This can lead to emergence of resistant bacteria and high mortality and morbidity. List of Abbreviations: FPs: Family Physicians, CAP: Community Acquired Pneumonia.

Для цитирования: Akhter Saima, Rizvi Nadeem, Bhura Sajeer, Warraich Usman Ali. Management of community acquired pneumonia by Family Physicians.. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2017. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.334.12577.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.