MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10899-006-9040-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gambling studies · 2007

Validation of the Chinese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-C).

Oei Tian P S, Lin James, Raylu Namrata

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Gambling cognitions have constantly been associated with the development and maintenance of problem gambling. Despite researchers reporting high rates of gambling and problem gambling among the Chinese, little is known about the role of gambling cognitions among Chinese individuals (Raylu & Oei, 2004a). This is partly because there is a lack of validated instruments to assess gambling cognitions in this population. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to examine and validate the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale-Chinese version (GRCS-C), which was based on the 23-item Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS; Raylu & Oei, 2004b). Confirmatory Factory Analysis (CFA) using 422 Chinese participants (166 Male, 256 Female; Mean age = 32.28 years) from the general community (221 living in Australia and 201 living in Taiwan) confirmed that a five-factor model was a good fit for the data. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was .95, and ranged from .83 to .89 for the five factors. Concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validities of the GRCS (Chinese version) were also good suggesting that the GRCS-C is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing gambling cognitions among non-clinical Chinese samples.

Для цитирования: Oei Tian P S, Lin James, Raylu Namrata. Validation of the Chinese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-C).. Journal of gambling studies. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-006-9040-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.