Analysis on characteristics and multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium perfringens in western China.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to identify and analyse the distribution characteristics, toxin genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens and to investigate its resistance mechanisms and genetic characteristics.
METHODS
The MICs of various antibiotics against C. perfringens were determined using the agar dilution method, and resistance genes and toxin genotypes were detected by PCR. Genetic relationships were analysed using MLST. WGS was conducted on the DNB system and PacBio platforms.
RESULTS
Analysis of 36 strains of C. perfringens revealed that the major toxin types were types C and F, with 86.1% of the strains isolated from bile samples. Of these, 30.6% of the strains exhibited MDR, with resistance rates of 75.0%, 52.8% and 52.8% for penicillin, clindamycin and ampicillin, respectively; however, no resistance to metronidazole and carbapenems was observed. MLST analysis identified 29 STs, including 14 novel types. ST221 and ST498 were the dominant types. The WGS revealed that the most prevalent virulence factors are plc (100.0%), nagH (100.0%), colA (100.0%), nanJ (100.0%), entB (100%), nanH (97.0%), entA (97.0%) and nanI (90.9%). Among these factors, the primary determinants of tetracycline resistance are tetA (66.7%) and tetB (78.8%), which represent the most frequently detected antibiotic resistance genes.
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates that the infection rate of C. perfringens is relatively high, with the majority of isolated strains exhibiting MDR. The observed high levels of antibiotic resistance, combined with the significant genetic diversity of these strains, suggest a potential public health risk.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.