HNO · 2021
[Spontaneous course of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heitmann D, Scheffler B, Abrams J, Gerstner A O H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Traumatic eardrum perforation is a common presentation in otorhinolaryngologic practices and emergency clinics. A consistent management strategy (active intervention vs. watchful waiting) is, however, still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: In the following study, the outcome of watchful waiting is analyzed and presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A collective of 272 patients presenting at two different specialist ENT practices within days of traumatic tympanic membrane perforation from June 2002 to March 2019 were analyzed. Treatment was non-surgical, with prospective monitoring. Whereas antibiotics were not given at all in one practice, they were given only upon signs of infection in the other practice. The outcome was evaluated retrospectively on the basis of patient files.
RESULTS: The collective consisted of 185 males and 87 females. Mean age was 30 years (range: 7 months to 82 years). The perforations were most commonly located in the upper anterior and lower posterior quadrants. According to Griffin grading, the size was grade I in 97%. The three most common causes were impact to the ear, barotrauma, and foreign bodies. Under a watchful waiting regimen, 95% of the patients presenting for follow-up checks showed complete closure.
CONCLUSION: Watchful waiting can be assessed as appropriate in traumatic eardrum perforation, provided otorhinolaryngologic follow-up is ensured. An exception is blast injury, which is now much less common in Central Europe, as this is associated with a risk of secondary cholesteatomas. In these rare cases, active treatment with surgical exploration of the middle ear including relining the perforation is indicated.
OBJECTIVE: In the following study, the outcome of watchful waiting is analyzed and presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A collective of 272 patients presenting at two different specialist ENT practices within days of traumatic tympanic membrane perforation from June 2002 to March 2019 were analyzed. Treatment was non-surgical, with prospective monitoring. Whereas antibiotics were not given at all in one practice, they were given only upon signs of infection in the other practice. The outcome was evaluated retrospectively on the basis of patient files.
RESULTS: The collective consisted of 185 males and 87 females. Mean age was 30 years (range: 7 months to 82 years). The perforations were most commonly located in the upper anterior and lower posterior quadrants. According to Griffin grading, the size was grade I in 97%. The three most common causes were impact to the ear, barotrauma, and foreign bodies. Under a watchful waiting regimen, 95% of the patients presenting for follow-up checks showed complete closure.
CONCLUSION: Watchful waiting can be assessed as appropriate in traumatic eardrum perforation, provided otorhinolaryngologic follow-up is ensured. An exception is blast injury, which is now much less common in Central Europe, as this is associated with a risk of secondary cholesteatomas. In these rare cases, active treatment with surgical exploration of the middle ear including relining the perforation is indicated.