Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021
Peripheral Nerve Conduction And Sympathetic Skin Response Are Reliable Methods to Detect Diabetic Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Xiaopu, Chen Chuna, Liu Yingshan, Peng Yu, Chen Zhenguo, Huang Haishan, Xu Lingling
Аннотация
AIM: This study aimed to investigate the role of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and sympathetic skin response (SSR) in evaluating diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy (DCAN).
METHODS: DCAN was diagnosed using the Ewing test combined with heart rate variability analysis. NCS and SSR were assessed by electrophysiological methods. The association between NCS/SSR and DCAN was assessed via multivariate regression and receiver-operating characteristic analyses.
RESULTS: The amplitude and conduction velocity of the motor/sensory nerve were found to be significantly lower in the DCAN+ group (all P < 0.05). A lower amplitude of peroneal nerve motor fiber was found to be associated with increased odds for DCAN (OR 2.77, P < 0.05). The SSR amplitude was lower while the SSR latency was longer in the DCAN+ group than in the DCAN- group. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff points of upper/lower limb amplitude of SSR to indicate DCAN were 1.40 mV (sensitivity, 61.9%; specificity, 66.3%, P < 0.001) and 0.85 mV (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 68.5%, P < 0.001), respectively. The optimal cutoff points of upper/lower limb latency to indicate DCAN were 1.40 s (sensitivity, 61.9%; specificity, 62%, P < 0.05) and 1.81 s (sensitivity, 69.0%; specificity, 52.2%, P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: NCS and SSR are reliable methods to detect DCAN. Abnormality in the peroneal nerve (motor nerve) is crucial in predicting DCAN. SSR may help predict DCAN.
METHODS: DCAN was diagnosed using the Ewing test combined with heart rate variability analysis. NCS and SSR were assessed by electrophysiological methods. The association between NCS/SSR and DCAN was assessed via multivariate regression and receiver-operating characteristic analyses.
RESULTS: The amplitude and conduction velocity of the motor/sensory nerve were found to be significantly lower in the DCAN+ group (all P < 0.05). A lower amplitude of peroneal nerve motor fiber was found to be associated with increased odds for DCAN (OR 2.77, P < 0.05). The SSR amplitude was lower while the SSR latency was longer in the DCAN+ group than in the DCAN- group. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff points of upper/lower limb amplitude of SSR to indicate DCAN were 1.40 mV (sensitivity, 61.9%; specificity, 66.3%, P < 0.001) and 0.85 mV (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 68.5%, P < 0.001), respectively. The optimal cutoff points of upper/lower limb latency to indicate DCAN were 1.40 s (sensitivity, 61.9%; specificity, 62%, P < 0.05) and 1.81 s (sensitivity, 69.0%; specificity, 52.2%, P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: NCS and SSR are reliable methods to detect DCAN. Abnormality in the peroneal nerve (motor nerve) is crucial in predicting DCAN. SSR may help predict DCAN.