Annals of nuclear medicine · 2012
Reevaluation of FDG-PET/CT in patients with hoarseness caused by vocal cord palsy.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Minamimoto Ryogo, Kubota Kazuo, Morooka Miyako, Ito Kimiteru, Mitsumoto Takuya, Okasaki Momoko, Shimbo Takuro, Tayama Niro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Vocal cord palsy (VCP) is a potential cause of hoarseness that results in decreasing mobility of the vocal cord. VCP can arise from a variety of causes; so, systematic screening is warranted for the management of patients with VCP. Asymmetrical fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in vocal cords is a well-known feature in patients with VCP, but no detailed analysis has been performed. This study aimed at reevaluating the (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for patients with VCP.
METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed the results of FDG-PET/CT for 59 patients with VCP, compared to laryngoscopic findings. Quantitative analysis was performed using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and regions of interest were drawn over bilateral vocal cords as confirmed from the CT portion of PET/CT. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 14), in which VCP was caused by the lesion of the laryngeal area; Group 2 (n = 40), in which VCP was caused by the lesion on the root of the recurrent laryngeal nerve; and Group 3 (n = 5), in which VCP was caused by the lesion from the vagal center to the proximal vagus nerve.
RESULTS: For Group 1, higher FDG uptake in the paralyzed vocal cord was seen in 86 % of patients (mean SUVmax 8.1 ± 5.3 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4, paralyzed vs. non-paralyzed, respectively; P < 0.002). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 79 % for Group 1. Group 2 showed dominant FDG uptake in the non-paralyzed vocal cord (mean SUVmax 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4, non-paralyzed vs. paralyzed, respectively; P < 0.001). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 93 % for Group 2. Group 3 showed no statistically significant difference in FDG accumulation between non-paralyzed and paralyzed vocal cords (mean SUVmax 1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.3, non- paralyzed vs. paralyzed, respectively; P = 0.30). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 60 % for Group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG accumulation in the vocal cords is dependent on the lesion site causing VCP. In addition, FDG-PET/CT can contribute to identification of the lesion responsible for inducing VCP.
METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed the results of FDG-PET/CT for 59 patients with VCP, compared to laryngoscopic findings. Quantitative analysis was performed using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and regions of interest were drawn over bilateral vocal cords as confirmed from the CT portion of PET/CT. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 14), in which VCP was caused by the lesion of the laryngeal area; Group 2 (n = 40), in which VCP was caused by the lesion on the root of the recurrent laryngeal nerve; and Group 3 (n = 5), in which VCP was caused by the lesion from the vagal center to the proximal vagus nerve.
RESULTS: For Group 1, higher FDG uptake in the paralyzed vocal cord was seen in 86 % of patients (mean SUVmax 8.1 ± 5.3 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4, paralyzed vs. non-paralyzed, respectively; P < 0.002). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 79 % for Group 1. Group 2 showed dominant FDG uptake in the non-paralyzed vocal cord (mean SUVmax 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4, non-paralyzed vs. paralyzed, respectively; P < 0.001). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 93 % for Group 2. Group 3 showed no statistically significant difference in FDG accumulation between non-paralyzed and paralyzed vocal cords (mean SUVmax 1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.3, non- paralyzed vs. paralyzed, respectively; P = 0.30). The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for indicating the lesion causing VCP was 60 % for Group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG accumulation in the vocal cords is dependent on the lesion site causing VCP. In addition, FDG-PET/CT can contribute to identification of the lesion responsible for inducing VCP.