MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12688/f1000research.127895.2

Медицинская библиотека · F1000Research · 2023

Comparative evaluation of dermatoglyphic patterns between skeletal class I and skeletal class III malocclusion.

Achalli Sonika, Nayak U S Krishna, P S Murali, Shashidhar Keerthan, Kamath Vinayak

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Dermatoglyphics is the study of various dermal configurations on the fingers, palms, and soles. These appear during the 12th week of intrauterine life and develop completely by the 24th week. It is said that they remain constant thereafter. The aim of the present study was to compare and assess the association of dermatoglyphic patterns between skeletal class I and skeletal class III malocclusion.

Methods

Finger and palm prints were collected using the ink and roller method from 604 subjects who were divided into skeletal class I, class III with maxillary retrognathism and class III with mandibular prognathism based on lateral cephalogram assessment.

Results

Loop pattern was more predominant in skeletal class I malocclusion subjects and whorl pattern was more frequent in the other two groups. Total finger ridge count and atd angle also showed significant difference between the study groups.

Conclusions

The present study attempted in assessing the association between dermatoglyphic patterns and skeletal malocclusion. Analysing dermal configurations may aid in indicating the type of developing malocclusion and thus help in interceptive and preventive orthodontics.

Для цитирования: Achalli Sonika, Nayak U S Krishna, P S Murali, Shashidhar Keerthan, Kamath Vinayak. Comparative evaluation of dermatoglyphic patterns between skeletal class I and skeletal class III malocclusion.. F1000Research. 2023. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.127895.2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.