La Radiologia medica · 2025
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the concept of bone quality in dento-maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mistretta Fabio, Magnini Andrea, Cinci Lorenzo, Zanobini Patrizio, Pisano Maria, Barcali Eleonora, Bocchi Leonardo, Nardi Cosimo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Bone quality is currently considered a set of intrinsic characteristics of the bone, among which macro- and microarchitecture of the trabecular bone tissue stands out. The investigation of bone quality is crucial in maxillofacial area and especially in dental implant planning. Nevertheless, there is currently no consensus about what bone quality really represents. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of CBCT in assessing bone quality of mandibular and maxillary bones.
METHODS: This systematic review included fourteen articles selected via PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, with the following features: samples of maxillary or mandibular bones from living individuals or corpses; CBCT as diagnostic investigation tool; a reference standard in assessing bone quality. Ten studies using µCT as reference standard were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: CBCT voxel size was from 80 to 400 µm. Only half of the studies evaluated a considerable number of morphometric parameters as described by the Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Meta-analysis was only possible for the 3D Accuitomo 170 CBCT scanner with a voxel size of 80 µm. Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and Degree of Anisotropy (DA) microstructural parameters showed moderate to low heterogeneity among studies without significative differences between CBCT and μCT.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution CBCT with a voxel size down to 80 μm should be considered a suitable tool for the assessment of bone microarchitecture. Tb.Sp and DA showed similar values between CBCT and μCT and they could thus be considered as reliable tools for the assessment of bone quality with CBCT. Nevertheless, the high heterogeneity in several bone microstructural parameters and the lack of standardization both in imaging protocols and in image analysis software made CBCT not adequate to be currently deemed the gold standard technique for the assessment of jawbones quality.
METHODS: This systematic review included fourteen articles selected via PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, with the following features: samples of maxillary or mandibular bones from living individuals or corpses; CBCT as diagnostic investigation tool; a reference standard in assessing bone quality. Ten studies using µCT as reference standard were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: CBCT voxel size was from 80 to 400 µm. Only half of the studies evaluated a considerable number of morphometric parameters as described by the Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Meta-analysis was only possible for the 3D Accuitomo 170 CBCT scanner with a voxel size of 80 µm. Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and Degree of Anisotropy (DA) microstructural parameters showed moderate to low heterogeneity among studies without significative differences between CBCT and μCT.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution CBCT with a voxel size down to 80 μm should be considered a suitable tool for the assessment of bone microarchitecture. Tb.Sp and DA showed similar values between CBCT and μCT and they could thus be considered as reliable tools for the assessment of bone quality with CBCT. Nevertheless, the high heterogeneity in several bone microstructural parameters and the lack of standardization both in imaging protocols and in image analysis software made CBCT not adequate to be currently deemed the gold standard technique for the assessment of jawbones quality.