A Digital Approach to Extracting Horizontally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: The Cross-Sectioning Method.

INTRODUCTION

Surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular third molars, particularly those requiring osteotomy, is highly sensitive to the surgeons' experience and poses challenges for residents to master. This study introduces the Cross-sectioning method developed through digital measurement and resistance analysis to minimise bone removal during extraction.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A comparative study of 400 patients (200 per group) undergoing either Cross-sectioning or Traditional method was conducted. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based digital measurements validated an odontosection depth of 9 mm through the distomarginal ridge at a 75° angle to the occlusal plane for the Cross-sectioning protocol. The Cross-sectioning protocol involved dividing the tooth into four segments (distolingual, mesiolingual, mesiobuccal, distobuccal) for sequential removal, whereas the Traditional method involved bifurcation with root extraction before crown.

RESULTS

The Cross-sectioning group demonstrated significantly shorter operation times, reduced postoperative pain, and swelling compared to the traditional group (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis (Pell and Gregory classification) revealed superior outcomes for Cross-sectioning: in Horizontal-IIA cases, shorter operation time (p < 0.01) and reduced swelling (p < 0.05); in Horizontal-IIB cases, superior outcomes in operation time and complications (p < 0.01); in Horizontal-IIC cases, shorter operation time (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION: The Cross-sectioning method effectively reduces bone and adjacent tooth resistance, offering a structured approach for resident training to enhance procedural efficiency and minimise complications.

CONCLUSION

The Cross-sectioning method represents a precise, clinically advantageous technique for impacted third molar extraction, emphasising targeted odontosection depth and improved postoperative outcomes.