Journal of dentistry · 2025
Posterior monolithic 3-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses: one-year interim results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hjerppe Jenni, Ioannidis Alexis, Valdés Ana María, Thoma Daniel S, Jung Ronald E, Palma Cristián Manuel Bravo, Mühlemann Sven
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare the survival rates and clinical outcomes of posterior 3-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) to veneered zirconia FDPs.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients missing single teeth in the posterior mandible or maxilla were recruited. Patients' restorations were randomly allocated to three groups: 1) monolithic zirconia FDPs (Mono-FDP, n = 21); 2) partially veneered zirconia FDPs (PV-FDP, n = 21); 3) circumferentially veneered zirconia FDPs (V-FDP, n = 22). Technical complications were evaluated by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at one-year follow-up appointments. Radiographs, clinical parameters including probing pocket depths (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of prostheses and patients were evaluated at baseline and one-year follow-up appointments. The results were evaluated descriptively.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were available for re-examination, two patients in PV-FDP group were lost to follow-up. At one-year follow-up, no FDPs were lost. Technical complication rates, namely small fractures were 0 % in the mono-FDPs, 9.5 % (2) in PV-FDPs and 22.7 % (5) in V-FDPs. USPHS rating A for patient satisfaction (PROMs) was given to 85.7 % (18) of Mono-FDPs, 85.7 % (18) of PV-FDPs and 90.9 % (20) of V-FDPs revealing high patient satisfaction with FPDs in all the groups at one year.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the one-year interim results of this clinical study of the posterior tooth-supported FDPs, monolithic zirconia FDPs seem to show no technical complications whereas the veneered zirconia FDPs exhibited veneering porcelain chippings. Survival and biologic outcomes were excellent in all the study groups.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present one-year interim results show that veneered, partially veneered and monolithic FDPs can be used with good confidence, however, FDPs with veneering ceramic might exhibit ceramic chippings.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients missing single teeth in the posterior mandible or maxilla were recruited. Patients' restorations were randomly allocated to three groups: 1) monolithic zirconia FDPs (Mono-FDP, n = 21); 2) partially veneered zirconia FDPs (PV-FDP, n = 21); 3) circumferentially veneered zirconia FDPs (V-FDP, n = 22). Technical complications were evaluated by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at one-year follow-up appointments. Radiographs, clinical parameters including probing pocket depths (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of prostheses and patients were evaluated at baseline and one-year follow-up appointments. The results were evaluated descriptively.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were available for re-examination, two patients in PV-FDP group were lost to follow-up. At one-year follow-up, no FDPs were lost. Technical complication rates, namely small fractures were 0 % in the mono-FDPs, 9.5 % (2) in PV-FDPs and 22.7 % (5) in V-FDPs. USPHS rating A for patient satisfaction (PROMs) was given to 85.7 % (18) of Mono-FDPs, 85.7 % (18) of PV-FDPs and 90.9 % (20) of V-FDPs revealing high patient satisfaction with FPDs in all the groups at one year.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the one-year interim results of this clinical study of the posterior tooth-supported FDPs, monolithic zirconia FDPs seem to show no technical complications whereas the veneered zirconia FDPs exhibited veneering porcelain chippings. Survival and biologic outcomes were excellent in all the study groups.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present one-year interim results show that veneered, partially veneered and monolithic FDPs can be used with good confidence, however, FDPs with veneering ceramic might exhibit ceramic chippings.