Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2014
Diagnostic accuracy and risk factors of the different lacunar syndromes.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Altmann Marianne, Thommessen Bente, Rønning Ole Morten, Reichenbach Antje S, Fure Brynjar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The lacunar syndrome is characterized by pure motor, pure sensory, or sensorimotor hemisymptoms without cortical deficits. It may be less predictable for a lacunar infarct (LI) than previously believed. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different lacunar syndromes and investigate factors associated with acute LI on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with an acute lacunar syndrome who were admitted to the stroke unit were enrolled. The patients were examined clinically and underwent magnetic resonance imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of the different lacunar syndromes were assessed using DWI as reference test, and we estimated positive and negative predictive values. Patients were divided into a LI group and a group without LI. Between-group differences were analyzed by χ(2) test, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Logistic regression was performed to analyze predictors of LI. Candidate variables were pure motor syndrome, age, gender, hypertension, precerebral or intracerebral stenosis, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and smoking.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with lacunar syndrome underwent DWI. The positive predictive value of the lacunar syndrome was 65.1% and 75% for the pure motor syndrome. Of the candidate variables, only pure motor syndrome and male gender had significant associations with LI on imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical diagnosis of patients with lacunar syndromes is inaccurate, especially among patients with sensorimotor syndrome. DWI is mandatory for obtaining an accurate diagnosis of the infarct.
METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with an acute lacunar syndrome who were admitted to the stroke unit were enrolled. The patients were examined clinically and underwent magnetic resonance imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of the different lacunar syndromes were assessed using DWI as reference test, and we estimated positive and negative predictive values. Patients were divided into a LI group and a group without LI. Between-group differences were analyzed by χ(2) test, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Logistic regression was performed to analyze predictors of LI. Candidate variables were pure motor syndrome, age, gender, hypertension, precerebral or intracerebral stenosis, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and smoking.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with lacunar syndrome underwent DWI. The positive predictive value of the lacunar syndrome was 65.1% and 75% for the pure motor syndrome. Of the candidate variables, only pure motor syndrome and male gender had significant associations with LI on imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical diagnosis of patients with lacunar syndromes is inaccurate, especially among patients with sensorimotor syndrome. DWI is mandatory for obtaining an accurate diagnosis of the infarct.