Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2011
A double-masked study to compare the efficacy and safety of topical cromolyn for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yao-lin, Hu Fung-Rong, Wang I-Jong, Chen Wei-Li, Hou Yu-Chih
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical cromolyn between with and without preservative for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
METHODS: A double-masked study was performed in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Each cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution with or without 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) was randomized to apply on either eye. The efficacy and safety were evaluated every other week by a questionnaire about ocular itching, redness and foreign body sensation, and objective scores of conjunctival redness, chemosis, cornea erosion and discharge using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. An overall response was also rated by physician's impression.
RESULTS: A total of 37 subjects were enrolled in this study but only 33 completed the study. All of subjective questionnaire scores showed a significant improvement after treatment in both groups. Objective score of redness significantly decreased after treatment in either groups but not chemisos or discharge. After 4-week treatment, corneal erosion diminished significantly in the group without preservative but not in the group with 0.01% BAK. There was no significant difference between with and without 0.01% BAK groups in each subjective or objective score. No adverse effect related with medication was observed.
CONCLUSION: Cromolyn 2 % ophthalmic solution was effective and safe to treat allergic conjunctivitis. A short-term use of cromolyn 2 % ophthalmic solution with 0.01% BAK would not cause any significant toxicity in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Preservative-free cromolyn may be beneficial to the compromised eyes or eyes required of long-term medication.
METHODS: A double-masked study was performed in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Each cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution with or without 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) was randomized to apply on either eye. The efficacy and safety were evaluated every other week by a questionnaire about ocular itching, redness and foreign body sensation, and objective scores of conjunctival redness, chemosis, cornea erosion and discharge using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. An overall response was also rated by physician's impression.
RESULTS: A total of 37 subjects were enrolled in this study but only 33 completed the study. All of subjective questionnaire scores showed a significant improvement after treatment in both groups. Objective score of redness significantly decreased after treatment in either groups but not chemisos or discharge. After 4-week treatment, corneal erosion diminished significantly in the group without preservative but not in the group with 0.01% BAK. There was no significant difference between with and without 0.01% BAK groups in each subjective or objective score. No adverse effect related with medication was observed.
CONCLUSION: Cromolyn 2 % ophthalmic solution was effective and safe to treat allergic conjunctivitis. A short-term use of cromolyn 2 % ophthalmic solution with 0.01% BAK would not cause any significant toxicity in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Preservative-free cromolyn may be beneficial to the compromised eyes or eyes required of long-term medication.