MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s1138741600004765

Медицинская библиотека · The Spanish journal of psychology · 2004

The Multi-Center Dilemma Project: an investigation on the role of cognitive conflicts in health.

Feixas Guillem, Saúl Luis Angel

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The Multi-Center Dilemma Project is a collaborative research endeavour aimed at determining the role of dilemmas--a kind of cognitive conflict, detected by using an adaptation of Kelly's Repertory Grid Technique--in a variety of clinical conditions. Implicative dilemmas appear in one third of the non-clinical group (n = 321) and in about half of the clinical group (n = 286), the latter having a proportion of dilemmas that doubles that of the non-clinical sample. Within the clinical group, we studied 87 subjects, after completing a psychotherapy process, and found that therapy helps to dissolve those dilemmas. We also studied, independently, a group of subjects diagnosed with social phobia (n = 13) and a group diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (n = 13) in comparison to non-clinical groups. In both health related problems, dilemmas seem to be quite relevant. Altogether, these studies, though preliminary (and with a small group size in some cases), yield a promising perspective to the unexplored area of the role of cognitive conflicts as an issue to consider when trying to understand some clinical conditions, as well as a focus to be dealt with in psychotherapy when dilemmas are identified.

Для цитирования: Feixas Guillem, Saúl Luis Angel. The Multi-Center Dilemma Project: an investigation on the role of cognitive conflicts in health.. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2004. DOI: 10.1017/s1138741600004765.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.