Clinical oral investigations · 2022
Invasive surgical procedures for the management of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effects on pain and jaw mobility.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodhen Roque Miguel, de Holanda Thiago Azario, Barbon Fabíola Jardim, de Oliveira da Rosa Wellington Luiz, Boscato Noéli
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review compared minimally and invasive surgical procedures to manage arthrogenous temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review included clinical trials assessing surgical procedures of arthrogenous temporomandibular disorder (TMD) management by carrying out comparisons within the same surgical procedure (pre- and post-treatment) as well as between different surgical procedures. Meta-analyses were conducted only for similar comparison reporting the same outcome measures, visual analog scale (VAS) values to evaluate pain and maximum incisal opening (MIO) values.
RESULTS: Of the 1,015 studies identified by the search strategy, 26 were selected for full-text reading, and 19 were included in the review. Of these, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis and 3 in the qualitative analysis. The VAS scores showed significantly lower values after discectomies (p < 0.001) and discoplasties (p < 0.001) in the within-group comparison. Moreover, significantly lower VAS scores and higher MIO values were observed after discectomy compared to arthroscopy, eminectomy, and discoplasty (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review suggest that although significantly lower VAS scores and higher MIO values were observed after discectomy, the currently available scientific evidence is unclear, and the use of invasive surgical procedures should not be implemented as an efficient first-line treatment option for arthrogenous TMD management.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: VAS and MIO outcomes could be insufficient to describe the success or failure of open surgical procedures like discectomy and discoplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review included clinical trials assessing surgical procedures of arthrogenous temporomandibular disorder (TMD) management by carrying out comparisons within the same surgical procedure (pre- and post-treatment) as well as between different surgical procedures. Meta-analyses were conducted only for similar comparison reporting the same outcome measures, visual analog scale (VAS) values to evaluate pain and maximum incisal opening (MIO) values.
RESULTS: Of the 1,015 studies identified by the search strategy, 26 were selected for full-text reading, and 19 were included in the review. Of these, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis and 3 in the qualitative analysis. The VAS scores showed significantly lower values after discectomies (p < 0.001) and discoplasties (p < 0.001) in the within-group comparison. Moreover, significantly lower VAS scores and higher MIO values were observed after discectomy compared to arthroscopy, eminectomy, and discoplasty (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review suggest that although significantly lower VAS scores and higher MIO values were observed after discectomy, the currently available scientific evidence is unclear, and the use of invasive surgical procedures should not be implemented as an efficient first-line treatment option for arthrogenous TMD management.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: VAS and MIO outcomes could be insufficient to describe the success or failure of open surgical procedures like discectomy and discoplasty.