Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2021
Viability of the quintessential 5 temporomandibular disorder symptoms as a TMD screener.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yap Adrian Ujin, Zhang Min-Juan, Zhang Xiao-Han, Cao Ye, Fu Kai-Yuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the viability of using the 5 temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms (5Ts) of the Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs (DC/TMD) as a TMD screener.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1039 adults (≥18 years old) with a mean age of 32.65 ± 12.95 years (77.4% women) from a tertiary dental hospital were enrolled. The 5Ts questionnaire (involving items on TMD/facial pain, headaches, temporomandibular joint noises, and closed- and open-locking) was administered, and TMD diagnoses were derived through clinical interviews and examinations, radiographic investigations, and the DC/TMD diagnostic algorithms and diagnostic tree. Diagnostic accuracy of the 5Ts was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and various measures, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: Among the participants, 80.2% (n = 833) were 5Ts-positive, and 19.8% (n = 206) were 5Ts-negative, whereas 51.3% and 85.7% received at least 1 pain-related and intra-articular DC/TMD diagnosis, respectively. The 5Ts showed high accuracy for detecting all TMDs, pain-related and intra-articular, with area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.98, 1.00, and 0.98, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 96.1% to 99.2%, whereas specificity was 100.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 5Ts demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for identifying pain-related and/or intra-articular disorders.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1039 adults (≥18 years old) with a mean age of 32.65 ± 12.95 years (77.4% women) from a tertiary dental hospital were enrolled. The 5Ts questionnaire (involving items on TMD/facial pain, headaches, temporomandibular joint noises, and closed- and open-locking) was administered, and TMD diagnoses were derived through clinical interviews and examinations, radiographic investigations, and the DC/TMD diagnostic algorithms and diagnostic tree. Diagnostic accuracy of the 5Ts was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and various measures, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: Among the participants, 80.2% (n = 833) were 5Ts-positive, and 19.8% (n = 206) were 5Ts-negative, whereas 51.3% and 85.7% received at least 1 pain-related and intra-articular DC/TMD diagnosis, respectively. The 5Ts showed high accuracy for detecting all TMDs, pain-related and intra-articular, with area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.98, 1.00, and 0.98, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 96.1% to 99.2%, whereas specificity was 100.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 5Ts demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for identifying pain-related and/or intra-articular disorders.