DOI 10.1097/yct.0000000000000882
Airway Complications in Pregnant Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an evidence-based treatment for severe depression and bipolar disorder in pregnant women. Electroconvulsive therapy involves induction of general anesthesia, muscle relaxation, and positive-pressure ventilation. Airway manipulation may lead to complications such as vocal cord injury, aspiration, inability to ventilate, and death. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in the incidence of airway complications in pregnant patients who underwent mask ventilation (MV) versus endotracheal intubation (ETI) compared with nonpregnant control subjects.
METHODS
We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of all adult pregnant patients who underwent anesthesia for ECT from June 1, 2011, to June 30, 2020. Each ECT treatment delivered to a pregnant patient was matched with 2 ECT treatments delivered to a nonpregnant female control subject. Charts were queried for airway management (MV vs ETI), gestational age, and airway complications. Each ECT treatment was considered an independent event.
RESULTS
Seventy-six ECT treatments from 11 pregnant patients were matched with 154 ECT treatments from 13 nonpregnant patients. In pregnant patients, airway management consisted of MV in 57 of the 76 treatments: 12 of 12 in the first trimester, 33 of 44 in the second trimester, and 12 of 20 in the third trimester. All 154 ECT treatments in the control group used MV. No airway complications were experienced in pregnant or nonpregnant patients with MV or ETI.
CONCLUSIONS
No airway complications were observed in pregnant patients undergoing MV or ETI regardless of gestational age.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.