International journal of cardiology · 2015
Prediction of survival and magnitude of reverse remodeling using the ST2-R2 score in heart failure: A multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lupón Josep, Sanders-van Wijk Sandra, Januzzi James L, de Antonio Marta, Gaggin Hanna K, Pfisterer Matthias, Galán Amparo, Shah Ravi, Brunner-La Rocca Hans-Peter, Bayes-Genis Antoni
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cardiac remodeling and its reversibility are key in HF outcomes. The ST2-R2 score was recently developed to predict relevant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (R2) in patients with heart failure (HF). In the present study we sought to validate the ST2-R2 score for grading improvement in LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV size at one year, and to evaluate its prognostic implication up to 4 years.
METHODS: A total of 569 patients with baseline LVEF <40% from three international cohorts (Barcelona, TIME-CHF, and PROTECT) were included in the study. Patients were classified into four strata based on their ST2-R2 score, which took into account concentrations of the biomarker ST2, non-ischemic etiology, absence of left bundle branch block, HF duration, baseline LVEF, and β-blocker treatment.
RESULTS: A significant relationship was observed between ST2-R2 scores and changes in LVEF and indexed LV sizes. LVEF recovery (from +5.6% to +17.3%; p<0.001), percentage reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (from -6.1% to -32.1%; p<0.001) and in LV end-systolic diameter index (from -1.1% to -18.6%; p<0.001) increased over the ST2-R2 strata. A similar trend was observed with diastolic parameters. Improvement in LV function and size was inversely predictive of mortality. Hazard ratios for risk of death, using the lower ST2-R2 score strata (<9) as a reference, were 0.49 (p<0.001; score 9-11), 0.27 (p<0.001; score 12-14), and 0.17 (p<0.001; score 15-17).
CONCLUSIONS: The ST2-R2 score predicts reverse LV remodeling in HF patients and is useful for predicting mortality up to 4years.
METHODS: A total of 569 patients with baseline LVEF <40% from three international cohorts (Barcelona, TIME-CHF, and PROTECT) were included in the study. Patients were classified into four strata based on their ST2-R2 score, which took into account concentrations of the biomarker ST2, non-ischemic etiology, absence of left bundle branch block, HF duration, baseline LVEF, and β-blocker treatment.
RESULTS: A significant relationship was observed between ST2-R2 scores and changes in LVEF and indexed LV sizes. LVEF recovery (from +5.6% to +17.3%; p<0.001), percentage reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (from -6.1% to -32.1%; p<0.001) and in LV end-systolic diameter index (from -1.1% to -18.6%; p<0.001) increased over the ST2-R2 strata. A similar trend was observed with diastolic parameters. Improvement in LV function and size was inversely predictive of mortality. Hazard ratios for risk of death, using the lower ST2-R2 score strata (<9) as a reference, were 0.49 (p<0.001; score 9-11), 0.27 (p<0.001; score 12-14), and 0.17 (p<0.001; score 15-17).
CONCLUSIONS: The ST2-R2 score predicts reverse LV remodeling in HF patients and is useful for predicting mortality up to 4years.