Military medicine · 2026
Estimating Blood Volume Loss With Wireless, Wearable Ultrasound: A Pilot Investigation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kenny Jon-Emile S, Hebscher Melissa, Savery Tracy, Atwi Sarah, Lachner-Piza Daniel, Eibl Andrew M, Eibl Joseph K, Vungarala Soumya, Dietz Niki M, Kim Chul-Ho, Johnson Bruce D
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Detecting and estimating blood volume loss are important for the diagnosis and management of life-threatening hemorrhage. There is a direct relationship between percent blood volume loss (BVL%) and falling in stroke volume (SV); furthermore, there is a direct relationship between diminishing SV and the corrected flow time of the carotid artery (ccFT). Therefore, we hypothesized that change in ccFT (ccFTΔ) would directly relate with BVL% in a phlebotomy paradigm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, convenience sample of healthy volunteers was studied. Volunteers underwent blood donation protocol in a physiology lab. A wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system monitored ccFT during blood donation. Traditional vital signs were also measured throughout. The relationship between traditional vital signs as well as ccFTΔ were compared to BVL% using 2 mixed linear regression models.
RESULTS: Data from 20 subjects and blood donations comprising 46,123 cardiac cycles are included. On average 413.5 ± 39 mL of blood were drawn representing 8.6 ± 1.6% BVL%. There was a significant and strong linear relationship between BVL% and ccFTΔ during blood draw with the regression slope demonstrating that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT there was a 0.4% reduction in blood volume.
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects and when blood loss is the sole mechanism for falling SV, we estimate that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT, there is an approximate 0.4 BVL%. Validation of these results in patients with traumatic hemorrhage is underway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, convenience sample of healthy volunteers was studied. Volunteers underwent blood donation protocol in a physiology lab. A wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system monitored ccFT during blood donation. Traditional vital signs were also measured throughout. The relationship between traditional vital signs as well as ccFTΔ were compared to BVL% using 2 mixed linear regression models.
RESULTS: Data from 20 subjects and blood donations comprising 46,123 cardiac cycles are included. On average 413.5 ± 39 mL of blood were drawn representing 8.6 ± 1.6% BVL%. There was a significant and strong linear relationship between BVL% and ccFTΔ during blood draw with the regression slope demonstrating that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT there was a 0.4% reduction in blood volume.
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects and when blood loss is the sole mechanism for falling SV, we estimate that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT, there is an approximate 0.4 BVL%. Validation of these results in patients with traumatic hemorrhage is underway.