Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
Comparison of the mechanical properties of retrieval basket catheters for bile duct stones: An experimental study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Inoue Tadahisa, Ibusuki Mayu, Kitano Rena, Sakamoto Kazumasa, Kimoto Satoshi, Kobayashi Yuji, Sumida Yoshio, Nakade Yukiomi, Ito Kiyoaki, Yoneda Masashi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although numerous retrieval baskets are currently available for the extraction of bile duct stones, their mechanical properties have not been evaluated. This study aimed to ascertain the characteristics of retrieval baskets for bile duct stones by examining their mechanical properties.
METHODS: This experimental study tested the mechanical properties of seven retrieval baskets for bile duct stones. The radial force (RF) was measured using a dedicated measurement device and the axial force (AF) was measured using the conventional manual method.
RESULTS: The mean RF differed significantly among the baskets (p < 0.001) and was the strongest for VorticCatch (1.62 N ± 0.02) and COAXIS (1.62 N ± 0.04), followed by RASEN (1.27 N ± 0.02), Memory Basket (0.95 N ± 0.01), 8-wire Nitinol Basket (0.93 N ± 0.01), StoneHunter (0.78 N ± 0.01) and Flower Basket (0.37 N ± 0.01), respectively. The mean AF differed significantly among the baskets (p < 0.001) and was the highest for VorticCatch (0.668 N ± 0.032), followed by COAXIS (0.629 N ± 0.041), StoneHunter (0.574 N ± 0.037), 8-wire Nitinol Basket (0.546 N ± 0.010), Memory Basket (0.542 N ± 0.024), RASEN (0.435 N ± 0.008) and Flower Basket (0.297 N ± 0.011), respectively. The baskets were categorized into four groups with comparable mechanical properties based on the RF and AF: group 1, low RF and low AF; group 2, moderate RF and moderate AF; group 3, high RF and moderate AF; and group 4, high RF and high AF.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed distinct mechanical properties of various retrieval baskets used for extracting bile duct stones, which may enhance the understanding of their action. Our results could also aid the development of retrieval baskets in future.
METHODS: This experimental study tested the mechanical properties of seven retrieval baskets for bile duct stones. The radial force (RF) was measured using a dedicated measurement device and the axial force (AF) was measured using the conventional manual method.
RESULTS: The mean RF differed significantly among the baskets (p < 0.001) and was the strongest for VorticCatch (1.62 N ± 0.02) and COAXIS (1.62 N ± 0.04), followed by RASEN (1.27 N ± 0.02), Memory Basket (0.95 N ± 0.01), 8-wire Nitinol Basket (0.93 N ± 0.01), StoneHunter (0.78 N ± 0.01) and Flower Basket (0.37 N ± 0.01), respectively. The mean AF differed significantly among the baskets (p < 0.001) and was the highest for VorticCatch (0.668 N ± 0.032), followed by COAXIS (0.629 N ± 0.041), StoneHunter (0.574 N ± 0.037), 8-wire Nitinol Basket (0.546 N ± 0.010), Memory Basket (0.542 N ± 0.024), RASEN (0.435 N ± 0.008) and Flower Basket (0.297 N ± 0.011), respectively. The baskets were categorized into four groups with comparable mechanical properties based on the RF and AF: group 1, low RF and low AF; group 2, moderate RF and moderate AF; group 3, high RF and moderate AF; and group 4, high RF and high AF.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed distinct mechanical properties of various retrieval baskets used for extracting bile duct stones, which may enhance the understanding of their action. Our results could also aid the development of retrieval baskets in future.