Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
Survival Benefit with Re-resection and Optimal Time to Re-resection in Gallbladder Cancer: a National Cancer Database Study.
ОбзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shah Shivani, Sweeney Ryan, Wegner Rodney E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Gallbladder cancer is often diagnosed incidentally after cholecystectomy. Most patients will then undergo re-resection for potential residual disease; however, overall survival (OS) benefit data in this scenario is variable. This National Cancer Database analysis (NCDB) compared OS in patients with T1b-T3 gallbladder cancer who underwent re-resection and evaluated if time to resection impacts OS.
METHODS: We reviewed the NCDB for patients who received initial cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer and were subsequently eligible for re-resection based on tumor stage (T1b-T3 disease). Patients with re-resection were subdivided into four cohorts based on time to re-resection: 0-4 weeks, 5-8 weeks, 9-12 weeks, and > 12 weeks. We used a Cox proportional hazards ratio to identify factors associated with worse survival and logistic regression to evaluate characteristics associated with re-resection. OS was calculated using Kaplan Meier curves.
RESULTS: A total of 791 (5.82%) patients received re-resection. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a comorbidity score of 1 was associated with worse survival. Patients with higher comorbidity scores and treatment at comprehensive community, integrated, or academic cancer programs were less likely to undergo re-resection. Re-resection showed significantly improved OS [HR 0.87; 95 CI 0.77-0.98; p = 0.0203]. Improved survival was appreciated when re-resection was completed at 5-8 weeks [HR 0.67; CI 0.57-0.81], 9-12 weeks [HR 0.64; CI 0.52-0.79], or > 12 weeks [HR 0.61; CI 0.47-0.78] compared to 0-4 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Optimal timing to re-resection in gallbladder cancer supports previous data showing benefit at > 4 weeks. However, there was no significant survival difference as to whether re-resection was completed at 5-8 weeks, 9-12 weeks, or > 12 weeks post initial cholecystectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the NCDB for patients who received initial cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer and were subsequently eligible for re-resection based on tumor stage (T1b-T3 disease). Patients with re-resection were subdivided into four cohorts based on time to re-resection: 0-4 weeks, 5-8 weeks, 9-12 weeks, and > 12 weeks. We used a Cox proportional hazards ratio to identify factors associated with worse survival and logistic regression to evaluate characteristics associated with re-resection. OS was calculated using Kaplan Meier curves.
RESULTS: A total of 791 (5.82%) patients received re-resection. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a comorbidity score of 1 was associated with worse survival. Patients with higher comorbidity scores and treatment at comprehensive community, integrated, or academic cancer programs were less likely to undergo re-resection. Re-resection showed significantly improved OS [HR 0.87; 95 CI 0.77-0.98; p = 0.0203]. Improved survival was appreciated when re-resection was completed at 5-8 weeks [HR 0.67; CI 0.57-0.81], 9-12 weeks [HR 0.64; CI 0.52-0.79], or > 12 weeks [HR 0.61; CI 0.47-0.78] compared to 0-4 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Optimal timing to re-resection in gallbladder cancer supports previous data showing benefit at > 4 weeks. However, there was no significant survival difference as to whether re-resection was completed at 5-8 weeks, 9-12 weeks, or > 12 weeks post initial cholecystectomy.