MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.nmd.0000120892.96624.00

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2004

Illness beliefs of depressed Chinese American patients in primary care.

Yeung Albert, Chang Doris, Gresham Robert L, Nierenberg Andrew A, Fava Maurizio

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study investigated the illness beliefs of 40 depressed Chinese Americans in a primary care setting using the Exploratory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC). Twenty-two depressed Chinese Americans (76%) complained of somatic symptoms; 4 (14%) reported psychological symptoms including irritability, rumination, and poor memory. No patients reported depressed mood spontaneously. Yet, 93% endorsed depressed mood when they filled out the CBDI. Twenty-one patients (72%) did not know the name of their illness or did not consider it a diagnosable medical illness, and five patients (17%) attributed their symptoms to pre-existing medical problems. Only three patients (10%) labeled their illness as psychiatric conditions. The patients generally sought help from general hospital (69%), lay help (62%), and alternative treatment (55%) but rarely from mental health professionals (3.5%) for their depressive symptoms. The results suggest that many Chinese Americans do not consider depressed mood a symptom to report to their physicians, and many are unfamiliar with depression as a treatable psychiatric disorder.

Для цитирования: Yeung Albert, Chang Doris, Gresham Robert L, Nierenberg Andrew A, Fava Maurizio. Illness beliefs of depressed Chinese American patients in primary care.. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000120892.96624.00.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.