International journal of cardiology · 2017
Tpeak-Tend dispersion as a predictor for malignant arrhythmia events in patients with vasospastic angina.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xianpei Wang, Sha Wu, Chuanyu Gao, Juanjuan Yan, Chong Chen, Yongen Shi, Yu Feng, Zhenhao Lin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e interval) in electrocardiogram (ECG) has been reported to predict malignant arrhythmia events (MAE) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ion channelopathy. Tp-e interval and other ECG parameters as predictors for MAE was evaluated in patients with vasospastic angina (VA).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with VA (Non-MAE group) and 20 patients with VA complicated by MAE (MAE group) were enrolled in our Division of Cardiology between January 2010 and December 2015. Continuous variables were analyzed by t-test and categorical variables by Chi-square analysis. Patients with MAE showed greater QTc (corrected QT interval) dispersion (P=0.005), Tp-ec (corrected Tp-e) interval (P=0.001), Tp-ec dispersion (P<0.001) and Tp-e/QT ratio (P<0.001) than those in non-MAE groups when ST-segment elevated. After elevated ST-segment returned, there were no significant differences in these ECG parameters between two groups (All P>0.05). At univariate binary logistic regression analysis QTc dispersion (odds ratio(OR)=1.133; P=0.013), Tp-ec (OR=1.058; P=0.003), Tp-e/QT (OR=1.403; P=0.001), and Tp-ec dispersion (OR=1.497; P=0.004) were significantly associated with MAE. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, Tp-ec dispersion remained a predictor of MAE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that only AUC (Area under curve) of Tp-ec dispersion had significant difference with those in QTc dispersion (P<0.001), Tp-ec (P=0.003), and Tp-e/QT ratio (P=0.012), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: QTc dispersion, Tp-ec, Tp-e/QT and Tp-ec dispersion were significantly increased in VA patients with MAE than those without MAE when coronary spasm was onset. Prolonged Tp-ec dispersion was the best discriminators and a strong independent predictor of MAE in VA patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with VA (Non-MAE group) and 20 patients with VA complicated by MAE (MAE group) were enrolled in our Division of Cardiology between January 2010 and December 2015. Continuous variables were analyzed by t-test and categorical variables by Chi-square analysis. Patients with MAE showed greater QTc (corrected QT interval) dispersion (P=0.005), Tp-ec (corrected Tp-e) interval (P=0.001), Tp-ec dispersion (P<0.001) and Tp-e/QT ratio (P<0.001) than those in non-MAE groups when ST-segment elevated. After elevated ST-segment returned, there were no significant differences in these ECG parameters between two groups (All P>0.05). At univariate binary logistic regression analysis QTc dispersion (odds ratio(OR)=1.133; P=0.013), Tp-ec (OR=1.058; P=0.003), Tp-e/QT (OR=1.403; P=0.001), and Tp-ec dispersion (OR=1.497; P=0.004) were significantly associated with MAE. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, Tp-ec dispersion remained a predictor of MAE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that only AUC (Area under curve) of Tp-ec dispersion had significant difference with those in QTc dispersion (P<0.001), Tp-ec (P=0.003), and Tp-e/QT ratio (P=0.012), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: QTc dispersion, Tp-ec, Tp-e/QT and Tp-ec dispersion were significantly increased in VA patients with MAE than those without MAE when coronary spasm was onset. Prolonged Tp-ec dispersion was the best discriminators and a strong independent predictor of MAE in VA patients.