Frontiers in neurology · 2022
Evidence of Two Novel LAMA2 Variants in a Patient With Muscular Dystrophy: Facing the Challenges of a Certain Diagnosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meyer Stefanie, Kaulfuß Silke, Zechel Sabrina, Kummer Karsten, Seif Amir Hosseini Ali, Ernst Marielle Sophie, Schmidt Jens, Pauli Silke, Zschüntzsch Jana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Benefits and challenges resulting from advances in genetic diagnostics are two sides of the same coin. Facilitation of a correct and timely diagnosis is paralleled by challenges in interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS). Focusing on an individual VUS-re-classification pipeline, this study offers a diagnostic approach for clinically suspected hereditary muscular dystrophy by combining the expertise of an interdisciplinary team.
METHODS: In a multi-step approach, a thorough phenotype assessment including clinical examination, laboratory work, muscle MRI and histopathological evaluation of muscle was performed in combination with advanced Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Different in-silico tools and prediction programs like Alamut, SIFT, Polyphen, MutationTaster and M-Cap as well as 3D- modeling of protein structure and RNA-sequencing were employed to determine clinical significance of the LAMA2 variants.
RESULTS: Two previously unknown sequence alterations in LAMA2 were detected, a missense variant was classified initially according to ACMG guidelines as a VUS (class 3) whereas a second splice site variant was deemed as likely pathogenic (class 4). Pathogenicity of the splice site variant was confirmed by mRNA sequencing and nonsense mediated decay (NMD) was detected. Combination of the detected variants could be associated to the LGMDR23-phenotype based on the MRI matching and literature research.
DISCUSSION: Two novel variants in LAMA2 associated with LGMDR23-phenotype are described. This study illustrates challenges of the genetic findings due to their VUS classification and elucidates how individualized diagnostic procedure has contributed to the accurate diagnosis in the spectrum of LGMD.
METHODS: In a multi-step approach, a thorough phenotype assessment including clinical examination, laboratory work, muscle MRI and histopathological evaluation of muscle was performed in combination with advanced Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Different in-silico tools and prediction programs like Alamut, SIFT, Polyphen, MutationTaster and M-Cap as well as 3D- modeling of protein structure and RNA-sequencing were employed to determine clinical significance of the LAMA2 variants.
RESULTS: Two previously unknown sequence alterations in LAMA2 were detected, a missense variant was classified initially according to ACMG guidelines as a VUS (class 3) whereas a second splice site variant was deemed as likely pathogenic (class 4). Pathogenicity of the splice site variant was confirmed by mRNA sequencing and nonsense mediated decay (NMD) was detected. Combination of the detected variants could be associated to the LGMDR23-phenotype based on the MRI matching and literature research.
DISCUSSION: Two novel variants in LAMA2 associated with LGMDR23-phenotype are described. This study illustrates challenges of the genetic findings due to their VUS classification and elucidates how individualized diagnostic procedure has contributed to the accurate diagnosis in the spectrum of LGMD.