MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1214/21-aos2139

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of statistics · 2022

DETECTING MULTIPLE REPLICATING SIGNALS USING ADAPTIVE FILTERING PROCEDURES.

Wang Jingshu, Gui Lin, Su Weijie J, Sabatti Chiara, Owen Art B

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Replicability is a fundamental quality of scientific discoveries: we are interested in those signals that are detectable in different laboratories, different populations, across time etc. Unlike meta-analysis which accounts for experimental variability but does not guarantee replicability, testing a partial conjunction (PC) null aims specifically to identify the signals that are discovered in multiple studies. In many contemporary applications, for example, comparing multiple high-throughput genetic experiments, a large number M of PC nulls need to be tested simultaneously, calling for a multiple comparisons correction. However, standard multiple testing adjustments on the M PC p -values can be severely conservative, especially when M is large and the signals are sparse. We introduce AdaFilter, a new multiple testing procedure that increases power by adaptively filtering out unlikely candidates of PC nulls. We prove that AdaFilter can control FWER and FDR as long as data across studies are independent, and has much higher power than other existing methods. We illustrate the application of AdaFilter with three examples: microarray studies of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, single-cell RNA sequencing of T cells in lung cancer tumors and GWAS for metabolomics.

Для цитирования: Wang Jingshu, Gui Lin, Su Weijie J, Sabatti Chiara, Owen Art B. DETECTING MULTIPLE REPLICATING SIGNALS USING ADAPTIVE FILTERING PROCEDURES.. Annals of statistics. 2022. DOI: 10.1214/21-aos2139.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.