Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2024
Efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in a Phase 2 trial in adults with cystic fibrosis.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Konstan Michael W, Polineni Deepika, Chmiel James F, Bilodeau Lara, Middleton Peter G, Matouk Elias, Houle Jean-Marie, Pislariu Radu, Colin Patrick, Kianicka Irenej, Potvin Diane, Radzioch Danuta, Kotsimbos Tom, Zuckerman Jonathan B, Nasr Samya Z, Liou Theodore G, Lands Larry C, study Investigators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lung inflammation is associated with tissue damage in cystic fibrosis (CF). LAU-7b, a novel oral drug candidate, was shown to control inflammation and stabilize CFTR protein in the epithelial membrane during inflammatory stress in preclinical models of CF.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in adults with CF. LAU-7b or placebo was administered over 24 weeks as six 21-day treatment cycles each separated by 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at 24 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 166 subjects received at least one dose of study drug (Intent-To-Treat population, ITT), of which 122 received ≥5 treatment cycles (Per-Protocol population, PP). Both treatment arms showed a mean lung function loss at 24 weeks of 1.18 ppFEV1 points with LAU-7b and 1.95 ppFEV1 with placebo, a 0.77 ppFEV1 (40 s) difference, p=0.345, and a 0.95 ppFEV1 (49 %) difference in the same direction in PP population, p=0.263. Primary analysis of mean ppFEV1 through 24 weeks showed differences of 1.01 and 1.23 ppFEV1, in the ITT (65 % less loss, p=0.067) and PP populations (78 % less loss, reaching statistical significance p=0.049), respectively. LAU-7b had an acceptable safety profile.
CONCLUSION: Although the study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint in the ITT population, LAU-7b was generally well tolerated and showed evidence of preservation of lung function to support further development.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in adults with CF. LAU-7b or placebo was administered over 24 weeks as six 21-day treatment cycles each separated by 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at 24 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 166 subjects received at least one dose of study drug (Intent-To-Treat population, ITT), of which 122 received ≥5 treatment cycles (Per-Protocol population, PP). Both treatment arms showed a mean lung function loss at 24 weeks of 1.18 ppFEV1 points with LAU-7b and 1.95 ppFEV1 with placebo, a 0.77 ppFEV1 (40 s) difference, p=0.345, and a 0.95 ppFEV1 (49 %) difference in the same direction in PP population, p=0.263. Primary analysis of mean ppFEV1 through 24 weeks showed differences of 1.01 and 1.23 ppFEV1, in the ITT (65 % less loss, p=0.067) and PP populations (78 % less loss, reaching statistical significance p=0.049), respectively. LAU-7b had an acceptable safety profile.
CONCLUSION: Although the study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint in the ITT population, LAU-7b was generally well tolerated and showed evidence of preservation of lung function to support further development.