The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024
In vitro and intracellular activity of vaborbactam combined with β-lactams against Mycobacterium abscessus.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sanchez Léa, Bitar Maria, Herail Quentin, Dorchêne Delphine, Hugonnet Jean-Emmanuel, Arthur Michel, Mainardi Jean-Luc
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Mycobacterium abscessus has emerged as an opportunistic pathogen responsible for lung infections, especially in cystic fibrosis patients. In spite of the production of the broad-spectrum β-lactamase BlaMab, the carbapenem imipenem is recommended in the initial phase of the treatment of pulmonary infections. Here, we determine whether the addition of vaborbactam, a second-generation β-lactamase inhibitor belonging to the boronate family, improves the activity of β-lactams against M. abscessus.
METHODS: The activity of β-lactams, alone or in combination with vaborbactam, was evaluated against M. abscessus CIP104536 by determining MICs, time-killing and intramacrophage activity. Kinetic parameters for the inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam were determined by spectrophotometry.
RESULTS: The combination of vaborbactam (8 mg/L) with β-lactams decreased more than 8 times the MIC of amoxicillin (from >1024 to 128 mg/L) and 2 times the MICs of meropenem (from 16 to 8 mg/L) and imipenem (from 4 to 2 mg/L). The reduction of the MICs was less than that obtained with avibactam at 4 mg/L for amoxicillin (from >1024 to 16 mg/L, more than 64 times less) and for meropenem (from 16 to 4 mg/L, 4 times less). In vitro and intracellularly, M. abscessus was not killed by the meropenem/vaborbactam combination, in spite of significant in vitro inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam decreases the MIC of β-lactams, including that of meropenem. As meropenem/vaborbactam is clinically available, this combination offers an alternative therapeutic option that should be evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to M. abscessus.
METHODS: The activity of β-lactams, alone or in combination with vaborbactam, was evaluated against M. abscessus CIP104536 by determining MICs, time-killing and intramacrophage activity. Kinetic parameters for the inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam were determined by spectrophotometry.
RESULTS: The combination of vaborbactam (8 mg/L) with β-lactams decreased more than 8 times the MIC of amoxicillin (from >1024 to 128 mg/L) and 2 times the MICs of meropenem (from 16 to 8 mg/L) and imipenem (from 4 to 2 mg/L). The reduction of the MICs was less than that obtained with avibactam at 4 mg/L for amoxicillin (from >1024 to 16 mg/L, more than 64 times less) and for meropenem (from 16 to 4 mg/L, 4 times less). In vitro and intracellularly, M. abscessus was not killed by the meropenem/vaborbactam combination, in spite of significant in vitro inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of BlaMab by vaborbactam decreases the MIC of β-lactams, including that of meropenem. As meropenem/vaborbactam is clinically available, this combination offers an alternative therapeutic option that should be evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to M. abscessus.