EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
Suprasternal brachiocephalic approach as an alternative route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Capretti Giuliana, Urena Marina, Himbert Dominique, Ghodbane Walid, Gardy Verdonk Constance, Goublaire Coppelia, Alkhoder Soleiman, Raffoul Richard, Carrasco Jose Luis, Laredo Mikael, Nataf Patrick, Vahanian Alec
Аннотация
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcomes of TAVI performed via the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach in selected patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk who are not eligible for transfemoral or subclavian TAVI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2014 to March 2016, 26 high-risk patients without transfemoral or subclavian access options were considered for TAVI via a suprasternal brachiocephalic approach. The feasibility of the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach was determined according to computed tomography findings. In 23 (88.4%) patients the procedure was performed as intended, whereas in three (11.5%) patients the approach was converted to a right carotid access. Both self-expanding (n=20, 76.9%) and balloon-expandable prostheses (n=6, 23.1%) were used. At 30 days, no patient had died; there was one major stroke (3.8%) and there were three major vascular access site-related complications (11.5%). After a median follow-up of 317 days (57-705), two patients had died, both from cardiovascular causes, and 19 out of 24 survivors (79.2%) were in New York Heart Association functional Class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre case series suggests that TAVI using the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach is feasible in selected patients and may represent an additional alternative route in patients who are not eligible for other approaches.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2014 to March 2016, 26 high-risk patients without transfemoral or subclavian access options were considered for TAVI via a suprasternal brachiocephalic approach. The feasibility of the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach was determined according to computed tomography findings. In 23 (88.4%) patients the procedure was performed as intended, whereas in three (11.5%) patients the approach was converted to a right carotid access. Both self-expanding (n=20, 76.9%) and balloon-expandable prostheses (n=6, 23.1%) were used. At 30 days, no patient had died; there was one major stroke (3.8%) and there were three major vascular access site-related complications (11.5%). After a median follow-up of 317 days (57-705), two patients had died, both from cardiovascular causes, and 19 out of 24 survivors (79.2%) were in New York Heart Association functional Class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre case series suggests that TAVI using the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach is feasible in selected patients and may represent an additional alternative route in patients who are not eligible for other approaches.