Journal of dental sciences · 2026
In vitro characterization of tooth-derived and dentin-derived graft particles: Comparative analysis of particle size, mineral composition, and cytotoxicity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luu Vinh Quang, Le Nhan Duc, Nguyen Bich-Ly Thi, Le Son Hoang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Characteristics of grafting material influence its osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. This study aimed to compare tooth-derived particles (TDPs) with dentin-derived particles (DDPs) with respect to particle size, demineralization behavior, elemental composition, and cytotoxicity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: TDP materials and DDP materials were cleaned, air-dried, ground using a Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio, Bergen, NJ, United States), and sorted by particle size. Both materials were demineralized with 10 % ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at various time points and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine the structural changes and the time required to reach 30 % residual Ca. Samples that achieved this level were subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity according to ISO 10993-12:2021.
RESULTS: Particle size distribution was significantly different between TDPs and DDPs. The proportion of particles suitable for grafting was higher in DDPs (69.12 %) than in TDPs (55.98 %). Although the percentages of Ca and P during demineralization were slightly higher in TDPs than in DDPs, the differences were not significant. Both Ca and P contents, as well as the Ca/P ratio, decreased significantly with increasing demineralization time. Samples from both groups, adjusted to approximately 30 % residual Ca, were non-cytotoxic and met the ISO safety criteria for biological experimentation.
CONCLUSION: DDPs have a more favorable size distribution than TDPs, requiring 17-20 min of 10 % EDTA to reach optimal 70 % Ca removal. The resulting materials are non-cytotoxic, supporting their safe and effective use as autogenous grafts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: TDP materials and DDP materials were cleaned, air-dried, ground using a Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio, Bergen, NJ, United States), and sorted by particle size. Both materials were demineralized with 10 % ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at various time points and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine the structural changes and the time required to reach 30 % residual Ca. Samples that achieved this level were subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity according to ISO 10993-12:2021.
RESULTS: Particle size distribution was significantly different between TDPs and DDPs. The proportion of particles suitable for grafting was higher in DDPs (69.12 %) than in TDPs (55.98 %). Although the percentages of Ca and P during demineralization were slightly higher in TDPs than in DDPs, the differences were not significant. Both Ca and P contents, as well as the Ca/P ratio, decreased significantly with increasing demineralization time. Samples from both groups, adjusted to approximately 30 % residual Ca, were non-cytotoxic and met the ISO safety criteria for biological experimentation.
CONCLUSION: DDPs have a more favorable size distribution than TDPs, requiring 17-20 min of 10 % EDTA to reach optimal 70 % Ca removal. The resulting materials are non-cytotoxic, supporting their safe and effective use as autogenous grafts.