Head & neck · 2025
Diagnostic Performance of Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Preoperative Detection of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Bosheng, Cheng Gang, Mo Yeping, Dai Juyi, Cheng Shijiao, Gong Shijun, Li Heng, Liu Youyuan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the performance of imaging-based artificial intelligence (AI) models in diagnosing preoperative cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 25, 2025. Studies were selected that focused on imaging-based AI models for predicting cervical LNM in cN0 PTC. The diagnostic performance metrics were analyzed using a bivariate random-effects model, and study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.
RESULTS: From 671 articles, 11 studies involving 3366 patients were included. Ultrasound (US)-based AI models showed pooled sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.82, significantly higher than radiologists (p < 0.001). CT-based AI models demonstrated sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.89.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-based AI models, particularly US-based AI, show promising diagnostic performance. There is a need for further multicenter prospective studies for validation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: (CRD420251063416).
METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 25, 2025. Studies were selected that focused on imaging-based AI models for predicting cervical LNM in cN0 PTC. The diagnostic performance metrics were analyzed using a bivariate random-effects model, and study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.
RESULTS: From 671 articles, 11 studies involving 3366 patients were included. Ultrasound (US)-based AI models showed pooled sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.82, significantly higher than radiologists (p < 0.001). CT-based AI models demonstrated sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.89.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-based AI models, particularly US-based AI, show promising diagnostic performance. There is a need for further multicenter prospective studies for validation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: (CRD420251063416).