European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2017
Prediction of fluoroscopic angulations for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by CT angiography: influence on procedural parameters.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hell Michaela M, Biburger Lukas, Marwan Mohamed, Schuhbaeck Annika, Achenbach Stephan, Lell Michael, Uder Michael, Arnold Martin
Аннотация
AIMS: Repeated angiograms to achieve an exactly orthogonal visualization of the aortic valve plane can substantially contribute to the total contrast amount required for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated whether pre-procedural identification of an optimal fluoroscopic projection by cardiac computed tomography (CT) can significantly reduce the amount of a procedure-related contrast agent compared with angiographic determination of suitable angulations.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients (81 ± 5 years, 55% male) with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis and normal renal function who underwent cardiac CT prior to TAVI were prospectively randomized. In 40 patients, a CT-predicted suitable angulation was used for the first aortic angiogram (CT cohort); in the other 40 patients, the first aortogram was acquired at LAO 10°/cranial 10 (angiography cohort). Additional aortograms were performed if no satisfactory view of the aortic valve plane was obtained. The number of aortograms needed to achieve a satisfactory fluoroscopic projection (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.7; P < 0.001) and the total amount of contrast agent per TAVI procedure were significantly lower in the CT cohort (95 ± 21 vs. 125 ± 36 mL; P < 0.001). Incidence of acute kidney injury was not significantly different. There was no significant difference regarding radiation dose, time of procedure, degree of post-procedural aortic regurgitation, complications and 30-day mortality between the cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural identification of a suitable fluoroscopic projection by cardiac CT significantly reduces a procedural contrast agent volume required for TAVI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients (81 ± 5 years, 55% male) with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis and normal renal function who underwent cardiac CT prior to TAVI were prospectively randomized. In 40 patients, a CT-predicted suitable angulation was used for the first aortic angiogram (CT cohort); in the other 40 patients, the first aortogram was acquired at LAO 10°/cranial 10 (angiography cohort). Additional aortograms were performed if no satisfactory view of the aortic valve plane was obtained. The number of aortograms needed to achieve a satisfactory fluoroscopic projection (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.7; P < 0.001) and the total amount of contrast agent per TAVI procedure were significantly lower in the CT cohort (95 ± 21 vs. 125 ± 36 mL; P < 0.001). Incidence of acute kidney injury was not significantly different. There was no significant difference regarding radiation dose, time of procedure, degree of post-procedural aortic regurgitation, complications and 30-day mortality between the cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural identification of a suitable fluoroscopic projection by cardiac CT significantly reduces a procedural contrast agent volume required for TAVI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisCohort StudiesComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricSurvival RateTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment Outcome