European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2007
Malignant disease in peptic ulcer surgery patients after long term follow-up: a cohort study of 1992 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jenkins J T, Duncan J R, Hole D, O'Dwyer P J, McGregor J R
Аннотация
AIMS: To assess the effect of previous peptic ulcer surgery on subsequent malignant events, in particular in relation to previous vagotomy, a historical cohort study was conducted.
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery for peptic ulcer disease with accurate follow-up data at a large peptic ulcer clinic in the Western Infirmary, Glasgow, from 1965 to 1983 were assessed. All cancer events and specific cancer events (gastric, bronchial, laryngeal, colorectal, bladder, breast, prostate, pancreas, kidney, oesophageal cancers) were determined as outcome measures and expressed as standardised incidence ratio (SIR).
RESULTS: Vagotomy and drainage accounted for 67% of all procedures for peptic ulcer disease. Eighty-three percent were habitual smokers. For all peptic ulcer surgery patients, the SIR for all cancer events was 0.86. For specific cancers, the SIRs were bronchial cancer (SIR 1.13); laryngeal cancer (SIR 2.17), colorectal cancer (SIR 0.67). For vagotomised patients the risk of gastric cancer was significantly elevated (SIR 1.50).
CONCLUSIONS: An excess of cancers attributable to smoking have been found in peptic ulcer surgery patients. Vagotomised patients have a higher risk of gastric cancer after long term follow-up. This finding may have implications for screening and the safety of long term acid suppression with agents such as proton pump inhibitors.
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery for peptic ulcer disease with accurate follow-up data at a large peptic ulcer clinic in the Western Infirmary, Glasgow, from 1965 to 1983 were assessed. All cancer events and specific cancer events (gastric, bronchial, laryngeal, colorectal, bladder, breast, prostate, pancreas, kidney, oesophageal cancers) were determined as outcome measures and expressed as standardised incidence ratio (SIR).
RESULTS: Vagotomy and drainage accounted for 67% of all procedures for peptic ulcer disease. Eighty-three percent were habitual smokers. For all peptic ulcer surgery patients, the SIR for all cancer events was 0.86. For specific cancers, the SIRs were bronchial cancer (SIR 1.13); laryngeal cancer (SIR 2.17), colorectal cancer (SIR 0.67). For vagotomised patients the risk of gastric cancer was significantly elevated (SIR 1.50).
CONCLUSIONS: An excess of cancers attributable to smoking have been found in peptic ulcer surgery patients. Vagotomised patients have a higher risk of gastric cancer after long term follow-up. This finding may have implications for screening and the safety of long term acid suppression with agents such as proton pump inhibitors.