MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2012

[Unexpectedly complicated laryngoscopy caused by a massive mandibular tori].

Suzuki Sari, Hino Hirofumi, Ohji Moriyoshi, Doi Akiko, Mukumoto Chisako, Tateda Takeshi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Here, we report a case of an unexpectedly complicated laryngoscopy caused by massive mandibular tori. A 64-year-old man with mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation was scheduled for a double valve replacement. Thyromental distance and the Mallampati score were used as predictive factors of difficult intubation, and both factors were within the normal range. Anesthesia with controlled ventilation was started with fentanyl, propofol and vecuronium. After the attainment of full muscle relaxation, an experienced anesthesiologist performed direct laryngoscopy. It was not possible to intubate the patient under direct laryngoscopy because of massive mandibular tori which had not been detected prior to induction. Following the failure of direct laryngoscopy, a McCoy laryngoscope and a gum elastic bougie were deployed to improve vision. Intubation with a 7.5 mm tube was successful at the third attempt. We hope our experience will serve as a reminder to clinicians that mandibular tori, although benign and without subjective symptoms, could have significant effects upon direct laryngoscopy by compromising the line of vision. Preoperative oral evaluation is critical and aggressive treatment should be considered.

Для цитирования: Suzuki Sari, Hino Hirofumi, Ohji Moriyoshi, Doi Akiko, Mukumoto Chisako, Tateda Takeshi. [Unexpectedly complicated laryngoscopy caused by a massive mandibular tori].. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.