The Journal of urology · 1980
Comparison of the inflatable penile and the Small-Carrion prostheses in the surgical treatment of erectile impotence.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malloy T R, Wein A J, Carpiniello V L
Аннотация
In 1974 a combined 3-hospital assessment was undertaken to evaluate the surgical treatment of erectile impotence. A comparison study on the inflatable penile and the rigid rod (Small-Carrion) prostheses was established. The inflatable penile prosthesis was implanted in 105 patients, while 45 men received the Small-Carrion prosthesis. A long-term success rate was achieved in 98 patients (93 per cent) who received the inflatable prosthesis. This prosthesis was removed in 7 cases because of infection, pain or inability to operate it. Functional success was achieved in 39 patients (88 per cent) with the Samll-Carrion prosthesis. This prosthesis was removed in 6 cases, mainly because of infection and erosion of the rods into the urethra or glans penis. A guide line to proper prosthetic selection is presented for various patient populations.