Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
Variable abnormality of the melanopsin-derived portion of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and parkinsonism features.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gaynes Bruce I, Zaffer Adnaan, Yousefzai Raman, Chazaro-Cortes Mario, Colletta Kalea, Kletzel Sandra L, Jost Mary Beth, Park Youngsook, Chawla Jasvinder, Albert Mark V, Xiao Ting
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Ascertain and quantify abnormality of the melanopsin-derived portion of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and parkinsonism features based on a statistical predictive modeling strategy for PLR classification.
METHODS: Exploratory cohort analysis of pupillary kinetics in non-disease controls, PD subjects, and subjects with parkinsonism features using chromatic pupillometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve interpretation of pupillary changes consistent with abnormality of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) was employed using a thresholding algorithm to discriminate pupillary abnormality between study groups.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled, including 17 PD subjects (age range 64-85, mean 70.65) and nine controls (age range 48-95, mean 63.89). Two subjects were described as demonstrating parkinsonism symptoms due to presumed Lewy body dementia and motor system atrophy (MSA) respectively. On aggregate analysis, PD subjects demonstrated abnormal but variable pupillary dynamics suggestive of ipRGC abnormality. Subjects with parkinsonism features did not demonstrate pupillary changes consistent with ipRGC abnormality. There was no relationship between levodopa equivalent dosage or PD severity and ipRGC abnormality. The pupillary test sensitivity in predicting PD was 0.75 and likelihood ratio was 1.2.
CONCLUSIONS: ipRGC deficit is demonstrated in PD subjects; however, the degree and constancy of abnormality appear variable.
METHODS: Exploratory cohort analysis of pupillary kinetics in non-disease controls, PD subjects, and subjects with parkinsonism features using chromatic pupillometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve interpretation of pupillary changes consistent with abnormality of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) was employed using a thresholding algorithm to discriminate pupillary abnormality between study groups.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled, including 17 PD subjects (age range 64-85, mean 70.65) and nine controls (age range 48-95, mean 63.89). Two subjects were described as demonstrating parkinsonism symptoms due to presumed Lewy body dementia and motor system atrophy (MSA) respectively. On aggregate analysis, PD subjects demonstrated abnormal but variable pupillary dynamics suggestive of ipRGC abnormality. Subjects with parkinsonism features did not demonstrate pupillary changes consistent with ipRGC abnormality. There was no relationship between levodopa equivalent dosage or PD severity and ipRGC abnormality. The pupillary test sensitivity in predicting PD was 0.75 and likelihood ratio was 1.2.
CONCLUSIONS: ipRGC deficit is demonstrated in PD subjects; however, the degree and constancy of abnormality appear variable.